Research Opportunities in Satellite Earth Observation
On this page
Publication date:
Application due not later than
Summary of Key Information
- Eligible recipients: Eligible recipients are limited to Canadian universities and post-secondary institutions.
- Grants
- Maximum amount per project: up to $150,000
- Estimated total amount of the AO: up to $3,000,000
- Number of potential agreements: approximately 20
- Maximum Timeframe of the Project: up to 36 months depending on project length
- Estimated projects start date:
1 Introduction
This Announcement of Opportunity (AO) is consistent with the terms and conditions of the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) Class Grant and Contribution Program to Support Research, Awareness and Learning in Space Science and Technology – Research Component (the Grants and Contributions (G&C) Program).
The applicant is asked to read the following AO thoroughly before submitting their applications. This AO was prepared to help applicants complete the application process, and outlines key elements, including mandatory criteria for eligibility, details on eligible projects and the selection process.
The Canadian Space Agency (CSA) is pleased to announce an opportunity for the post-secondary academic community interested in satellite Earth observation.
This AO is issued through CSA's smartEarth initiative including 3 tracks (Accelerator, the Integrator and the Enabler), which aims to:
- Develop innovative satellite data solutions to help meet various needs on Earth and in our everyday lives;
- Increase collaboration among Canadian stakeholders;
- Enhance expertise, growth and competitiveness in Canada's space sector; and
- Advance scientific knowledge.
More specifically, this AO falls under the Enabler track, which aims here to support the academic community in acquiring the knowledge and expertise to develop and leverage new applications in Earth Observation (EO) by fostering the continued development of a critical mass of researchers and highly qualified personnel in Canada. It also intends to support Canada's international commitments related to space and EO partnerships by encouraging applicants to include partners or collaborators in their proposals, including Canada–Europe and academia–industry collaborations. This AO also aims to address EO trends and to expand the use of EO-based mapping applications among non-traditional EO users.
2 AO objective
The objectives of this AO are:
- Advancing knowledge, research capacity, and innovation within the post-secondary academic community interested in remote sensing and/or Earth Observation, by encouraging collaboration (see definition in Appendix A.4) with other academic departments and faculties, post-secondary institutions, the Canadian space industry, other government departments and international partners;
- Supporting the development of space solutions in the form of innovative applications (see definition in Section 3.2) to meet today's challenges resulting in a better future for all Canadians;
- Leveraging emerging opportunities such as technologies and capabilities (for example, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence), as well as the growing sources of satellite remote sensing/Earth observation data to maximize innovation opportunities and application potential.
To align the AO with the priorities, gaps, and opportunities identified in the Canadian EO sector, applications are organized into three streams:
- Stream 1 – Applications and research and development (R&D) (see definition in Section 3.5) to advance knowledge and research capacity in remote sensing and Earth Observation by fostering cross-sector collaboration and supporting the development of space-based solutions, including low Application Readiness Level (ARL) from ARL 1 to ARL 4.
- Stream 2 – Acting collectively to bridge EO and society, aiming to generate societal and economic benefits, through high Application Readiness Level from ARL 5 to ARL 7 for Canadian academia and industry collaborations to incubate and integrate EO applications, solutions and tools for use by non-traditional end-users (e.g., municipalities, provinces and territories, Indigenous communities).
- Stream 3 – Exploitation of available data of RADARSAT missions to advance Canadian Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) applications and partnerships through the use of RADARSAT Constellation Mission (RCM), RADARSAT-1 and RADARSAT-2 data and in preparation for the utilization of next-generation of SAR satellites, including ARL 1 to 7 (see subsection Data in Section 3.2 for details).
The Application Readiness Level (ARL) system and structure have been adopted in the smartEarth context, as illustrated below. For the purposes of this AO, the term "Application" is used broadly and encompasses technologies, methods, and applications. This may include research into new and innovative solutions that address issues of importance to Canada and encourage the use of EO data by students, academics, and the general public.
For this purpose, the applicant should clearly identify the current state-of-the-art and its corresponding ARL and then identify the target ARL that the research is expected to achieve. A project can also remain within the same ARL throughout its duration, if it demonstrates an advancement. This should be explained in the appropriate section of the application form.
The maximum Application Readiness Level (ARL) attainable for the overall project under this AO is ARL 7.
The ARL system that has been created for the smartEarth context is comprised of the following structure:
3 Eligibility criteria
In this section
3.1 Eligible Recipients
Eligible recipients are limited to Canadian universities and post-secondary institutions.
3.2 Eligible Projects
To be eligible under this AO, projects must meet the eligibility criteria or one of the eligibility criteria as follows:
- Research activities of interest to Canada related to space science and technology disciplines and their applications.
- Activities that sustain space research and development (R&D) (see definition in Section 3.5) capabilities.
- Studies to develop capabilities that enhance the space sector.
- End project phases such as analyses of space data and the transformation of those data into useful information, dissemination of the ensuing results.
All development phases necessary for a project are eligible for funding. Any logical breakdown or combination of these phases can constitute a funded project under this AO. However, breaking down a project into numerous phases submitted as distinct proposals to obtain more than the maximum grant under this AO is not allowed. Furthermore, the completion of a funded phase does not automatically guarantee future funding of the remaining phases.
To be eligible, the activities outlined in the project must also align with the ARL ladder, described as follows. The projects within this component are those that seek to identify an application (ARL 1), consider innovative concepts (ARL 2), select a preferred approach (ARL 3), seek to develop a concept (ARL 4), validate the concept feasibility (ARL 5), integrate the application in the user environment (ARL 6), and refine the application solution (ARL 7). Detailed information about the ARL scale can be found in Appendix B.
The scope of the proposed project concept is broad and open in terms of the data, technologies, methods and applications that may be considered, provided that the project represents an advancement in the ARL ladder and bridges a gap in knowledge and information that has the potential of improving the applicant's capabilities.
This includes the following:
-
Data: Any sources of satellite EO data may be proposed for this purpose, many of which are available through open-access platforms. This includes a variety of optical and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery, as well as non-imagery data and other datasets.
Note: It will be the responsibility of the applicant to locate these data sources based on the objective of their proposed project and to obtain all of the data to be used in the project from commercial data providers or open-access platforms. If costs are to be incurred in acquiring EO imagery or other data types, the applicant should include these costs in their financial proposals and ensure they are commensurate with the value of the project.
For Stream 3 (see Section 2), the RADARSAT data subset must be identified, as it represents a major component of the project. This dataset may be complemented with other relevant datasets; however, the use of RADARSAT data should remain the main source of information. The RADARSAT catalog data is available via the Earth Observation Data Management System (EODMS) hosted by Natural Resources Canada (see Access to RADARSAT data).
- Technologies, methods and applications: The proposed project may be related to new applications, data products, models/prototypes, methodologies, and tools, systems, services provided that it is either new or an improvement.
- Applications areas: This AO may address any application area of importance and relevance to Canada, aligned with CSA's priorities (section 3.3).
Please note that projects with the following primary objectives are not eligible under the AO:
- The development or improvement of a specific technology such as a new sensor; or,
- Use or testing technology in preparation of a space flight.
3.3 Links to CSA Priorities
To be eligible, projects supported under this AO must contribute to at least one of the CSA priorities stated below as per Canada's Strategy for Satellite Earth Observation.
- Harnessing satellite EO to address climate change and issues that matter to Canadians;
- Strengthening the delivery of critical services to keep Canadians healthy, safe and informed; and
- Inspiring skills and capacity development for the next generation.
To be eligible, projects supported under this AO must contribute to at least one of the following CSA priorities stated below as per the 2026–27 Departmental Plan:
- Leveraging space in the delivery of critical services to Canadians; and
- Positioning the Canadian space ecosystem for prosperity.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to collaborate with European organizations (e.g., academic institutions, government organizations, industry partners, space agency, etc.) to strengthen Canada–Europe cooperation in Earth Observation. Where such collaborations are proposed, applicants should provide a letter of support describing the nature of the partnership, the roles, and contributions of each partner.
Applicants are encouraged to propose projects that increase the representation and advancement of women and underrepresented groups in space sciences and engineering. It is recommended that the applicants demonstrate how their organization or team contributes to equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) and Indigenous People involvement.
3.4 Links to the Class G&C Program Objectives
To be eligible, projects supported under this AO must contribute to the achievement of at least one of the following objectives:
- To support the development of science and technology relevant to the priorities of the Canadian Space Agency.
- To foster the continuing development of a critical mass of researchers and highly qualified people in Canada in areas relevant to the priorities of the Canadian Space Agency.
3.5 Basic Research and Development (R&D) Definition
To be eligible, projects supported under the G&C Program must meet the CSA basic R&D definition:
"Any pre-commercial science and technology activities that are carried out to resolve unknowns regarding the feasibility of (i) space concepts or (ii) applications in the space sector."
Basic R&D activities supported under the G&C Program shall be undertaken in Canada unless it is essential to the success of the project that they be undertaken outside the country.
4 Application
In this section
4.1 Required Documentation
The applicant must ensure that its application includes the required documents:
- A completed original Application Form signed by the duly authorized representative with all documentation and information mentioned therein.
- Proof of incorporation or registration (i.e., Corporation Registry).
- Letters from other funding contributors confirming their grants or contributions, if applicable.
- Letters of support, confirming participation to the project, if applicable.
- Curriculum vitae (CV) in the format of your choice for each member of the team.
- Documentation supporting the activities proposed within the project, if applicable.
The documents must be combined in a single PDF formatted file, in the same order as presented above with all security features disabled. The application form and supporting documents must be included in the file as a searchable PDF formatted document (PDF/A-1a format preferred). It is entirely the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that there are no accessibility issues with the submitted PDF file.
It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the application complies with all applicable federal, provincial/territorial and municipal laws and regulations.
The applicant must keep one hard copy of all the original documents above. The CSA may require applicants who successfully passed the evaluation stage to send a hard copy of their complete application with the original documents.
Additional governing documents might be requested in a later phase of the evaluation process.
Please note that incomplete applications will not be considered.
4.2 Submit the completed application electronically
The applicant must submit their application electronically by following the steps below:
- Submit an account creation request using the Electronic Proposal Portal. Note that Google Chrome is the browser of choice for submissions, but supported browsers are Google Chrome and MS Edge. It is strongly recommended that the applicant creates their account 1 week before the call's closing date.
- In the "Proposal title" field of the Electronic Proposal Portal, use the following naming convention: ROSEO_AO5_ Name of the post-secondary institution_Short Project Name (example: ROSEO_AO5_University XYZ_Optical application development). Only alphanumeric characters, spaces, underscores, and dashes are accepted.
- The "Applicant" section must contain the information for the Principal Investigator responsible for the research project as well as the Duly authorized representative of the institution (who will be signing the application on behalf of the institution). The applicant may add as many people as necessary to the proposal. It is important to note that all people added will have access to the same online application form and will have the possibility to make changes.
- Once submitted, the applicant and any additional contacts added by the applicant will each receive an email confirming the account creation. Applicants must allow up to three business days to receive the email, which will include a link to 1) the online application form and 2) another link to the secure portal where all required documents must be uploaded, along with the username, password and instructions (user guide).
- Using the username and the temporary password assigned by the CSA, login to the online application form. Some security features, such as firewalls, may hinder access and the CSA must be informed of any access issues as soon as possible. Applicants may save the information entered and return to the form later, if necessary, until the application submission deadline date.
- After completing the application form, print it as a PDF document before clicking "submit".
- The duly authorized representative of the institution must sign the application form.
- Combine all required documents into a single PDF document (please see Section 4.1 for details on the accepted format) and upload your complete and signed application package to the secure portal, using the link provided in the initial email, no later than . Please refer to the user guide for instructions on how to securely upload documents.
Important Notes:
- If technical issues related to an account creation or to an electronic submission arise, applicants must inform the CSA as soon as possible at the email address smartearth.utiliterre@asc-csa.gc.ca for the issue to be investigated. Applicants are strongly encouraged to upload their complete application package well before the submission deadline.
- Applications must be submitted (successfully uploaded to the secure portal) by the applicants no later than .
- The onus is on the applicant to ensure that their application is complete and that all documents are uploaded to the Electronic Proposal Portal before the prescribed deadline.
- The CSA is not responsible for any delays under any circumstances and will reject any applications that are uploaded after the stipulated deadline.
- Applications hand-delivered to the CSA will not be accepted.
- Applications sent by e-mail will not be accepted.
- If multiple applications are submitted, only the latest valid version received will be considered.
4.3 Service Standards – Complete Applications
Applicants will be notified in writing of decisions regarding their application. Selected applications will be announced on the CSA website. The CSA has set the following service standards for processing times: acknowledgement of receipt, funding decisions and payment procedures.
Acknowledgement: The CSA's goal is to acknowledge receipt of proposals within 2 weeks of receiving the completed application package.
Decision: The CSA's goal is to respond to the proposal within 17 weeks for this AO's closing date and to send a grant agreement for signature after formal approval of the proposal.
Payment:
The CSA's goal is to issue payment within 4 weeks of the successful fulfillment of the requirements outlined in the grant agreement but is under no obligation to meet this deadline.
Compliance with these service standards is a shared responsibility. Applicants must submit all required documentation in a timely fashion. Service standards may vary by Announcement of Opportunity.
5 Evaluation
In this section
5.1 Eligibility Criteria
- Represent an eligible recipient as defined in Section 3.1.
- Represent an eligible project as defined in Sections 3.2, 3.3, 3.4.
- Meet the basic R&D definition in Section 3.5 (if applicable); and
- Meet program funding provisions in section 6 Funding.
5.2 Evaluation Criteria
Applications will be evaluated according to the following criteria with scale rating indicated in percentage:
- Benefits to Canada (30 points)
- Project feasibility (10 points)
- Resources (20 points)
- Results (30 points); and
- Risk and risk mitigation measures (10 points).
The minimum passing score for each criterion is 60%. The final score for each application will be the cumulative total of the scores obtained across all five criteria. An application must achieve an overall minimum score of 60 points. Applications will then be ranked based on their final scores, and grants will be awarded in rank order. Definitions of the criteria are provided in Appendix A.
5.3 Evaluation Process
Only applications that have passed the eligibility assessment listed in Section 5.1 will be given further consideration.
Once the eligibility criteria are confirmed, evaluators will assess the screened applications according to the criteria listed in Section 5.2. Applicants are encouraged to provide a detailed and clear description of how they meet each criterion.
Evaluators shall be experts in the field(s) relevant to the applications and may include representatives of Government of Canada departments.
Before a final decision is made, the CSA may conduct any consultation and seek advice or comments, including, but not limited to, from suppliers, researchers, financial institutions, accounting firms, financing organizations, credit rating organizations, government agencies and organizations, as it deems necessary in order to obtain any information useful for the evaluation of this application.
The results obtained in this AO could take into account certain factors in the final decision to grant funding, such as, but not limited to, the representativeness of the four designated groups (woman, Aboriginal person, disabled person or member of a visible minority), regional distribution, academic level, distribution between universities and post-secondary educational institutions, etc.
6 Funding
In this section
6.1 Available Funding and Duration
The maximum grant that a recipient can receive from the CSA under this AO is $150,000 over a maximum period of 3 years. The funding per year per project is $50,000 for year 1, $50,000 for year 2, and $50,000 for 36 months. This AO may include provisions allowing implementing beneficiaries to request additional funding and an extension of the duration of the grant agreement.
Each eligible recipient can be funded for one project under this AO.
The number of projects under this AO will depend on funding availability.
To determine the amount of funding to be allocated, consideration will be given to the availability of CSA funds, the total cost of the project, and the other confirmed sources of funds provided by other stakeholders and the applicant.
The CSA reserves the right to reject any proposals or reduce the amount of the grants at its entire discretion.
6.2 Eligible Costs
Eligible costs are costs that are essential to carry out the Project, reasonable and directly related to the Project to achieve the expected results of the Project. The costs are to be incurred directly by the applicant. Incurred Costs means any expense made to carry out the Project related to an Eligible Cost which is due and payable. CSA will not contribute to costs Incurred prior to the coming into force of a Funding Agreement and after the Project Completion Date.
Eligible costs for under this AO can include:
- access fees;
- acquisition or rental of equipment;
- acquisition, development and printing of materials;
- and PST, HST and GST net of any rebate to which the recipient is entitled to and the reimbursement of any taxes for goods and services acquired in a foreign country net of any rebate or reimbursement received in the foreign country;
- consultant services;
- cost for carrying out environmental screening and/or impact studies;
- data acquisition;
- data management;
- laboratory analyses services;
- licenses and permits fees;
- material and supplies;
- overhead (administrative) costs (not to exceed 20% of eligible costs for universities and 15% for other eligible recipients);
- registration fees;
- Salaries and benefits (benefits not to exceed 20% of eligible salaries)
- travel
In no circumstance can the total amount of assistance from governmental sources (federal, provincial, territorial and municipal) to the recipient exceed 100% of the total project cost.
Eligible recipients are limited to Canadian universities and post-secondary institutions.
The applicants must identify all sources of funding in their applications and confirm this information in a funding agreement if the project is selected for funding. Upon completion of a project, the recipient must also disclose all sources of funding.
7 Financing agreement
In this section
7.1 Agreement
Upon favorable review of the applications, CSA will send a Grant agreement to the successful applicant. The Grant agreement will outline the rights, roles, and obligations of each respective party. In the event of any discrepancies between this AO and a Grant agreement between CSA and the recipient, the latter document will take precedence.
For greater clarity, no liability and no commitment or obligation exist on the part of the CSA to issue a Grant payment to the applicant until a Grant agreement is signed by both parties. Furthermore, any costs or expenses incurred or paid by the recipient prior to the execution of a written Grant agreement by both parties are the sole responsibility of the applicant, and no liability exists on the part of the CSA.
7.2 Payments
The CSA and a successful applicant (the recipient) will sign a funding agreement. This is a condition for any payment made by the CSA with respect to the approved project.
For Grant agreements, payments will be made in a lump sum or instalments as described in the signed agreement. Grant funding agreements will include a clause stipulating the recipient's obligation to confirm—once a year in the case of multi-year agreements—their eligibility for the G&C Program – Research Component and inform the CSA in writing of any changes to the conditions used in determining their eligibility for this component.
7.3 Audit
The recipient of a funding agreement shall keep proper records of all documentation related to the funded project, for the duration of the project and for three (3) years after the completion date of the project, in the event of an audit. This documentation shall be available upon request.
7.4 Intellectual Property
All intellectual property developed by the recipient in the course of the project shall vest in the recipient. The recipient will undertake to protect all intellectual property he will possess, acquire or develop during the project.
7.5 Organizations in Quebec
7.5.1 Act Respecting the Ministère du Conseil exécutif, CQLR c M-30
An organization in Quebec whose operations are partially or fully funded by the province of Quebec may be subject to the Act Respecting the Ministère du Conseil exécutif, CQLR c M-30.
Under Sections 3.11 and 3.12 of this Act, certain entities/organizations, as defined in the meaning of the Act, such as municipal bodies, school bodies, or public agencies, must obtain authorization from the Secrétariat du Québec aux relations canadiennes (SQRC), as indicated by the Act, before signing any funding agreement with the Government of Canada, its departments or agencies, or a federal public agency.
Consequently, any entity that is subject to the Act is responsible for obtaining such authorization before signing any funding agreement with the Government of Canada.
Quebec applicants must complete, Section 8A of the application form.
7.5.2 Loi sur la langue officielle et commune du Québec
La Loi sur la langue officielle et commune du Québec, le français (LLOQ) changes section 55 of the Charter of the French Language and came into force on . Since that date, the conclusion of a G&C Agreement in English in Quebec is subject to the following conditions for the recipient to be bound by the Agreement:
- A French version of the Agreement must be produced including the Schedules and must be given to the recipient before the signing of the English version.
- The recipient must consent to signs the Agreement in English and continue communications in English thereafter.
- Only one Agreement must be signed, either the French or English version.
7.6 Organizations in Alberta
An organization located in Alberta may be subject to the Provincial Priorities Act (Chapter P-35.5) (the Act) and its Provincial Priorities Regulation (Alberta Regulation 21/2025) (the Regulation).
As per section 2 of the Act, provincial entities listed in the Act and Regulations must obtain prior approval from the Government of Alberta in accordance with the process set out in the Act and in the Regulation before entering into an agreement with the Government of Canada.
Therefore, any entity that falls under the application of the Act or the Regulation must obtain such authorization prior to entering into an agreement with the Canadian Space Agency.
Applicants having activities in Alberta must complete Section 8C of the application form.
7.7 Performance Measurement
The CSA will ask the recipients to report on various performance measurement indicators throughout the execution of the project. Examples include but are not limited to number of applications having advanced their ARL (application readiness level), number of highly qualified personnel involved in projects funded by CSA, etc.
7.8 Open Access Publications
In the event that publications result from the project, the CSA wishes to promote the dissemination of findings that results from the projects it funds as quickly and to the greatest number of people as possible. Improved access to scientific results not only allows scientists to use a broader range of resources and knowledge, but also improves research collaboration and coordination, strengthens citizen engagement and supports the economy.
The CSA promotes the use of open access publication and archiving by recipients in order to facilitate the widest dissemination of findings that results from its funded projects. Thus, recipients are invited to publish, in a timely matter, their articles by using one of the following methods:
- Accessible online repository (institutional or disciplinary) so that the publication is freely accessible.
- Journal offering open access to articles.
It should be noted that these two methods are not mutually exclusive and that recipients are encouraged to use both.
Finally, the CSA wishes to receive, as a courtesy, a copy of the publications (if not freely accessible) or the hyperlink (if freely accessible) and its digital object identifier (DOI). These will be used to improve accessibility by including them in the CSA publications directory.
7.9 Conflict of Interest
If the applicant is employed by a federal government department, including the CSA, they are required to comply with all rules applicable to their department or federal organization in order to identify, prevent, and resolve any potential, apparent, or actual conflict of interest.
8 Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
It is the responsibility of the applicants to obtain clarification of the requirements contained herein, if necessary, before submitting an application.
For any questions related to the AO, applicants shall use the following email address smartearth.utiliterre@asc-csa.gc.ca. Questions and answers related to this AO will be posted on the CSA website in the Frequently Asked Questions section of this AO. CSA will respond to questions received before 17:00 ET, 10 business days prior to the closing date.
Please note that email communication does not meet government data protection requirements.
-
Question 1: Are travel expenses an eligible cost if allocated to a non-Canadian member of the project team?
Answer 1: Expenses related to travel, accommodations, meals and conferences fees are only eligible if allocated towards Canadian students (including international students) that are registered in a Canadian university or post-secondary institution, or to Canadian members of the project team (PIs and Co-Is who are Canadian citizens or permanent residents).
Travel: expenses shall be in direct relation to the project (ex. field work, project meetings). These costs must not exceed the limits of the National Joint Council Office (NJC) Travel Directive. With respect to the Treasury Board Directive, only the meal, private vehicle and incidental allowances specified in Appendices B, C and D of the Directive, and the other provisions of the Directive referring to "travelers", rather than those referring to "employees", are applicable.
-
Question 2: Are the salaries of university faculty or college professors/teachers eligible expenses?
Answer 2: The salaries of university faculty or college professors/teachers are not eligible expenses under this AO, however the salaries of non-faculty co-investigators (e.g. technicians, program managers, etc.) are eligible expenses (falling under the "Salaries and benefits" category).
-
Question 3: Can a grant recipient transfer funds to another organization through a sub-agreement?
Answer 3: Grants awarded by the CSA cannot be redistributed to another organization; however, goods or services from an organization that are normally offered on a fee basis may be considered as an eligible expense under a category such as "Consulting services", "Acquisition or rental of equipment," or "Materials and supplies."
-
Question 4: What types of expenditure can be eligible under Data acquisition costs and Data management fees?
Answer 4: Data acquisition costs: Can include, but not limited to, buying satellite imagery, data portal subscription fees. Data management fees: Can include, but is not limited to, data archiving, data processing and cloud computing fees.
-
Question 5: Where does my project fit in the ARL ladder?
Answer 5: This is a matter for the applicants to decide based on their understanding of the current state of the art with regards to the present level of knowledge and capabilities in the marketplace. The applicant should clearly identify the current state-of-the-art and its corresponding ARL, and then identify the target ARL that the research intends to achieve. Refer to Appendix B for detailed descriptions of the ARL scale.
-
Question 6: Is this a standalone funding opportunity or will there be others?
Answer 6: This is a one-time funding opportunity.
-
Question 7: Do team members (co-investigators) have to provide a letter of support in addition to their CV, even if they are university professors?
Answer 7: Yes, team members (co-investigators) must provide a letter of support.
9 Appendix A: Evaluation criteria
Scoring
-
Benefits to Canada
- Maximum: 30 points
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate how well the proposal aligns with the government of Canada priorities (see section 3.2, 3.3, 3.4), novelty and impact of the proposed work. The applicant must clearly identify the starting ARL (see Appendix B), the targeted ARL level at the end of the project and how this will be achieved.
This includes the following considerations:
- Does the proposal identify how it contributes to the CSA priorities?
- Does the project contribute to the development of new techniques, algorithms, or information products that have a significant impact in the long term?
- Does the proposal demonstrate the organization's commitment to equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) and/or the meaningful involvement of Indigenous Peoples (i.e., Decision-making power / Leadership, Stage of involvement, Community benefit / Impact, Integration of Indigenous knowledge)?
- Does it describe collaborations with organizations beyond the applicant's institution (e.g., academic institutions, industry, non-profit organizations, or international partners, including European partners)?
-
Results
- Maximum: 30 points
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate the likelihood that the proposed work can be applied and provide benefits to relevant stakeholders in a timely manner. In this context, stakeholders may include the private sector, the academic community (including professors, students, and researchers), government agencies, municipalities, provinces and territories, Indigenous communities, and other end users.
The purpose of this criterion is also to evaluate to what degree graduate students and early-career researchers will contribute to the proposed research. Proposals should include a development plan that describes how the HQP will be mentored to acquire the desired competencies and specific activities contributing to their experience development with the space utilization ecosystem.
This includes the following considerations:
- Does the proposal demonstrate that the proposed work will significantly benefit the stakeholders?
- Are specific activities and roles identified for the graduate student and/or early-career researcher who are taking part in the proposed work?
For each stream, examples include, but should not be limited to, improved state-of-the-art EO methods, tools, knowledge dissemination, and development of highly qualified personnel (HQP).
For proposals under Stream 1, the assessment should consider the potential to advance Earth observation and remote sensing research, scientific knowledge, research capacity, and cross-sector collaboration, including low Application Readiness Level (ARL) from ARL 1 to ARL 4. Examples include, but should not be limited to, the development of innovative EO methods or technologies and the establishment of new or strengthened partnerships.
For proposals under Stream 2, the assessment should consider the potential for societal and economic benefits through high Application Readiness Level from ARL 5 to ARL 7. Examples include, but should not be limited to, improved decision-making, operational use of EO applications, increased uptake by non-traditional end users, and strengthened collaboration between academia, industry, and end users.
For proposals under Stream 3, the assessment should consider the potential to advance Canadian Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) capabilities and strengthen partnerships. Examples include, but should not be limited to, the use of RADARSAT data, development of innovative SAR applications, and strengthened Canadian SAR expertise.
-
Feasibility
- Maximum: 10 points
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate how appropriate the proposed methodology is for achieving the goals of the proposed work within the duration of the grant.
Identify the data sets and study area that will be used in your research and explain how the data will help to demonstrate the proposed concept.
The methodology plan should summarize the main work breakdown structure (WBS), work packages (WP), and how the work will achieve the technical objectives for the proposed research (Applicants are encouraged to include a Gantt chart).
The management plan should summarize the milestones, schedule, and how the work will be managed.
This includes the following considerations:
- Does the methodology is likely to achieve all the proposal's goals?
- Does the proposed work schedule is complete and carefully planned?
- Are the goals listed in the proposal likely be completed during the grant?
-
Resources
- Maximum: 20 points
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate the expertise of the research team and the budget. The proposal should include a description for each of the proposed team members, including collaborators, stating their roles and responsibilities within the project. Resumes should be provided in an appendix. Add letter(s) of support, including but not limited to, other post-secondary institutions, Canadian space industry, other government departments, international partners, and Indigenous People, if applicable.
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate if the budget provided with the proposal is complete and feasible. The project schedule should include milestones, and a responsibility assignment matrix (RAM) included that shows the level of effort for each team member.
This includes the following considerations:
- Is the budget provided with the proposal complete and feasible?
- Does the proposed research team have significant experience in all fields relevant to the proposed research?
-
Risk and Mitigation
- Maximum: 10 points
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate how well the proposal identifies potential risks associated with the proposed scope of work, an assessment of the potential likelihood of the risk occurrence, its level of impact on the work, as well as mitigation strategies for each risk. The assessment should address both technical and management risks. Possible risks could include, but are not limited to, difficulty hiring appropriate HQP, loss of HQP to the project, difficulty acquiring needed parts, change in data availability, etc.
This includes the following consideration:
- Does the proposal list effective mitigation strategies for all risks to the completion of the proposed work?
- Does the proposal have omitted any significant risks to the proposed work?
Overall Evaluation Score
- Maximum score 100
- Minimum passing score 60
| Category | Description |
|---|---|
| Excellent | The proposal has all the required elements, most of them have an excellent level of details or is missing one minor element. |
| Good | The proposal has all the required elements, most of them have a good level of detail or is missing one moderate element or multiple minor ones. |
| Average (60% of the maximum points) | The proposal has all the required elements, and the level of detail is average or is missing one important element or multiple minor ones. |
| Poor | The proposal has all or some of the required elements, but the level of detail is poor. Or the proposal does not address the required elements. |
10 Appendix B: Application Readiness Level (ARL) descriptions
The smartEarth initiative is aimed at supporting the development of innovative applications concepts through their R&D phases, which include ARLs 1 to 7. These early to mid-stage phases represent the most challenging steps in creating new applications solutions and are therefore deserving of unique support and assistance. Although ARLs 8 and 9 are recognized as being very important for the ultimate success of a product or service, they go beyond the focus of the smartEarth initiative. There are many other sources of support for the downstream sector to pursue outside of the smartEarth initiative for these last two ARLs.
10.1 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 1
10.1.1 Identification of the Application – Foundational Concepts
This initial level is at the origin of identification for any innovative idea, leading to creative approaches that will potentially resolve challenges for an application in everyday life using space-based data in a Canadian context that may also have beneficial implications for the international community. At this stage a clear understanding of the application and the challenges it faces are summarized.
10.1.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- Identifying the application with challenges in need of an improvement or solution;
- Recognizing the fundamental nature of the application, including the underlying theory and dynamics in relation to space-based data.
10.1.3 Key Components
- Provide a comprehensive summary of the application and the challenges it faces, including applicable theory and dynamics, and its relevance to space data;
- Summarize the current importance and impact of the application to society.
10.2 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 2
10.2.1 Consideration of Innovative Concepts - State-of-the-Art
ARL-2 Maturity Level is the stage where innovative concepts are reviewed within the state-of-the-art for the application, and options for a potential solution are considered.
10.2.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- Clear understanding of the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) in relation to the chosen application;
- Review of the possible approach options that could result in a potential improvement to or eventual solution for the application. This may include new methods, systems, products or services.
10.2.3 Key Components
- Provide a comprehensive summary of the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) in relation to the chosen application with a relevant literature review;
- Identify the shortcomings in the current SOTA and the gaps that need to be filled;
- Summarize the approach options for a potential improvement to or eventual solution for the application.
10.3 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 3
10.3.1 Selection of Preferred Approach – Logic Based
Formulation of the concept and proposed approach for the chosen application that is based on sound principles and justifications, including a summary of all of the necessary concept elements and resources related to the development of the approach. The preferred approach should also summarize the innovation that has been introduced by the concept.
10.3.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- Clear rationale for the selection of the proposed approach including the development plan;
- Explanation as to how the proposed approach is an improvement over current approaches for the application.
10.3.3 Key Components
- Provide a logic-based justification for the selection of the proposed approach, including the basic underlying assumptions;
- Summarize the methodology to be used, including all of the necessary program elements;
- Identify the specific improvements and innovations that the approach will create.
10.4 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 4
10.4.1 Concept Development - Proof of Concept
The concept at this stage will be in a preliminary state whereby the key aspects of its main operating characteristics will have been determined and proven initially reliable for the selected application, but which has not yet been tested or validated in an operational context under a variety of conditions.
10.4.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- Individual components or aspects of the approach have been developed;
- Plan for the integration and validation of the approach components has been made;
- Risks with mitigation and corrective strategies have been considered.
10.4.3 Key Components
- The main aspects of the approach have been developed and preliminary tests successfully completed;
- Refinements to the approach have been justified and made;
- Individual components have been integrated into the overall system to confirm their viability.
10.5 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 5
10.5.1 Validation in the Application Context - Concept Feasibility
The basic components of the products, methods or service are integrated together into a prototype concept that will be validated against a real world application to identify and correct any outstanding shortcomings or modifications that may have to be made to ensure feasibility of the concept prior to moving to the next level.
10.5.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- The integrated components are to be validated and verified against empirical data related to the application;
- Based on the validation process and its results, changes to the approach may be made.
10.5.3 Key Components
- The feasibility of the concept has to be demonstrated using empirical or simulated data for the application;
- Any changes to the approach should be created and also demonstrated;
- The level of success should be quantifiable and realistically evaluated for the application, identifying its impact on the application.
10.6 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 6
10.6.1 Demonstration in the Application Environment - Confirmation
The concept is to be integrated and demonstrated in a relevant end user's environment and the operational decision making context to confirm its utility in addressing the application, and for the purpose of identifying implementation adjustments to the concept and its components. Further refinements may be required. This is the critical stage where the concept starts to become a proven solution for a particular application.
10.6.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- A true test of the concept in an operational context will be successfully completed and demonstrated;
- Additional improvements may be identified in order to address implementation issues.
10.6.3 Key Components
- The test in an operational context has been successfully conducted, including any adjustments to the approach that had been previously identified;
- The major advantages and limitations of the concept have been identified and summarized;
- Implications to the use of the concept within the operational context have been summarized.
10.7 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 7
10.7.1 Refined Application Solution - Tailored Solution
Based on the results of the previous steps, the implementation of the solution into an operational context will require further refinement and adjustments to meet the needs of the end user. In Canada this may involve very unique requirements related to language, indigenous people, northern and remote environments, extreme weather conditions over a wide range of application challenges.
10.7.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- The solution may have to be tailored to meet specific applications challenges;
- Although the solution may not be able to address the needs of all users in all circumstances, it should meet the needs of specific users with identifiable requirements to facilitate implementation.
10.7.3 Key Components
- Refinements to the solution should meet the needs of specific users and be tailored and demonstrated to address those particular requirements;
- Acceptance of the performance of the solution should be confirmed by the user along with their recommendations related to the operational steps.
Reminder – Maximum level attainable for this AO is ARL 7
10.8 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 8
10.8.1 Practical Implementation - Operational Use
The application product, method or service will be integrated into an end user's operational context to address a particular application challenge. Its utility will have been demonstrated and confirmed, and its role in the operational context will have tangible benefits to the end user and their partners.
10.8.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- The solution will have met or exceeded operational expectations and begin to build a proven record of achievement;
- The solution will begin to grow to a wider level of use or have a greater degree of impact within the user's operations.
10.8.3 Key Components
- The operational details for implementation will have been identified and accommodated within the user's organization, including training and procedures;
- Tangible benefits will be identified and summarized, along with any further recommendations for future improvements or uses.
10.9 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 9
10.9.1 Ready-to-Use Products and Services – Commercialization
The solution will have achieved a successful level of use within a user's operational environment and addressed the resolution of an application challenge. It will have reached a level of maturity to the point of its regular and consistent use within an operational context whereby the product, method or service would be ready for commercialization or for integration into other important user environments.
10.9.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- The solution has achieved widespread recognition and use within several operational environments;
- Ultimately, the solution has the potential to become the gold standard in addressing a pressing application challenge.
10.9.3 Key Components
- The solution is in regular, operational use within a variety of organizations and is recognized as an appropriate solution for a particular application;
- The solution has been commercialized and is enjoying rewarding sales and widespread use in the marketplace.
- The solution has potential to be extended to other applications fields and to new user communities.