Research opportunities in HAWC suborbital, science, and application development activities (ROHSSA)
On this page
- Introduction
- AO Objectives
- Eligibility criteria
- Notice of intent — stage 1
- Complete applications — stage 2
- Evaluation
- Funding
- Funding agreements
- Privacy notice statement
- Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
- Appendix a: evaluation criteria definition, scale rating, and scores
- Appendix b: eligible activities definition
- Appendix c: objectives and priorities
Key dates:
Note: To optimize the available budget, the following information is subject to change between award cycles and may be updated. All announcement of opportunity (AO) updates relevant to a given award cycle will take place at least eight (8) weeks prior to the deadline for applications under the cycle.
Application and Award Cycle 1 (PONEX)
- Application deadline: Closed , at 16:00 (ET)
Application and Award Cycle 2
- Notice of intent deadline: , at 16:00 (ET)
- Full application deadline: , at 16:00 (ET)
- Approximate project start and end dates: to
- Funding from CSA for this cycle: up to $540,000 toward eligible costs
- Estimated number of projects awarded:
- 0 for Advancing primary HAWC/AOS science objectives by conducting ground-based and/or airborne data collection (Stream 1).
- 1 for Advancing primary HAWC/AOS science objectives by conducting model development and/or data analysis (Stream 2).
- 1 for Advancing applications enabled by HAWC/AOS for a healthy and climate-resilient Canada (Stream 3).
Application and Award Cycle 3
- Notice of intent deadline: , at 16:00 (ET)
- Full application deadline: , at 16:00 (ET)
- Approximate project start and end dates: to
- Funding from CSA for this cycle: up to $810,000 toward eligible costs
- Estimated number of projects awarded:
- 0 for Advancing primary HAWC/AOS science objectives by conducting ground-based and/or airborne data collection (Stream 1).
- 2 for Advancing primary HAWC/AOS science objectives by conducting model development and/or data analysis (Stream 2).
- 1 for Advancing applications enabled by HAWC/AOS for a healthy and climate-resilient Canada (Stream 3).
Application and Award Cycle 4
- Notice of intent deadline: , at 16:00 (ET)
- Full application deadline: , at 16:00 (ET)
- Approximate project start and end dates: to
- Funding from CSA for this cycle: up to $810,000 toward eligible costs
- Estimated number of projects awarded:
- 0 for Advancing primary HAWC/AOS science objectives by conducting ground-based and/or airborne data collection (Stream 1).
- 2 for Advancing primary HAWC/AOS science objectives by conducting model development and/or data analysis (Stream 2).
- 1 for Advancing applications enabled by HAWC/AOS for a healthy and climate-resilient Canada (Stream 3).
Summary of key information
- Eligible Recipients: Canadian universities and post-secondary institutions
- Grants or Contributions: Grants
- Maximum Amount per Project: $270,000
- Maximum Amount per year per Project: $90,000
- Estimated Total Amount of the AO: $540,000
- A Lead Researcher may lead only one (1) grant at a time per ROHSSA Stream
- Maximum Timeframe of the Project: Three (3) years
1 Introduction
The Canadian Space Agency (CSA) is pleased to announce an opportunity for the Canadian space science community to pursue research and development activities in priority areas of the High-altitude Aerosols, Water vapour and Clouds (HAWC) mission.
HAWC is a Canadian-led initiative that serves as a contribution to NASA's Atmosphere Observing System (AOS). Measurements made by HAWC and the rest of the AOS will target information gaps in near-term predictions of weather, air pollutants/aerosols and surface hydrology, and in long-term climate projections.
With this Announcement of Opportunity (AO), the CSA solicits proposals for projects that will contribute to the following objectives:
- Advance primary HAWC/AOS science objectives;
- Advance applications enabled by HAWC/AOS for a healthy and climate-resilient Canada.
This AO is consistent with the terms and conditions of the CSA Class Grant and Contribution Program to Support Research, Awareness and Learning in Space Science and Technology - Research Component.
Applicants are asked to read the following AO thoroughly before submitting their applications. This AO was prepared to help applicants complete the application process, and outlines key elements, including mandatory criteria for eligibility, details on eligible projects and the selection process. In the event of any discrepancies between this AO and the individual funding agreements governing a project, the latter document(s) will take precedence.
2 AO Objectives
The objective of this AO is to support science and applications development activities related to the HAWC/AOS initiative.
More specifically, through this AO, the CSA seeks to:
- Advance HAWC/AOS science and applications through research and development;
- Increase Canadian participation in the HAWC/AOS initiative;
- Increase Earth system model developments and/or the use of data acquired and processed with CSA support.
Projects selected from this CSA competition must have as their objective to increase scientific knowledge that will contribute to the objectives of the HAWC/AOS initiative and enable the development of applications.
3 Eligibility criteria
In this section 3
3.1 Eligible Recipients
To be eligible, the applicant must be a recognized Canadian university or post-secondary institution. The Canadian Information Centre for International Credentials (CICIC) maintains a directory of recognized schools in Canada.
The researcher leading these projects must:
- Hold a PhD obtained from a recognized institution.
- Hold a permanent, term, or contract position at the applicant institution for the duration of the funding agreement. The position may be paid or unpaid. This includes Adjunct Faculty that may be employed by industry. The signature of the Duly Authorized Representative on the Application Form is sufficient evidence that the Applicant believes that the Lead Researcher will hold a position at the applicant institution for the duration of the funding agreement.
Note: A Lead Researcher may lead only one (1) grant at a time per ROHSSA Stream.
These are the sole conditions that must be satisfied at the time of application.
3.2 Eligible Projects
To be eligible for CSA funding, projects must consist of one or more of the following:
- Research activities of interest to Canada related to space science and technology disciplines and their applications;
- End project phases such as analyses of space data and the transformation of that data into useful information.
Projects must also meet funding limits specific to the targeted Stream (see section 7.1).
All development phases necessary for a project are eligible. Any logical breakdown or combination of these phases can constitute a funded project under this AO. However, breaking down a project into numerous phases submitted as distinct proposals to obtain more than the maximum grant or contribution under this AO is not allowed. Furthermore, the completion of a funded phase does not automatically guarantee future funding of the remaining phases.
To be eligible, the activities outlined in the project must also align with one of the following Streams:
- Stream 1: Advancing primary HAWC/AOS science objectives by conducting ground-based and/or airborne data collection.
- Stream 2: Advancing primary HAWC/AOS science objectives by conducting model development and/or data analysis.
- Stream 3: Advancing applications enabled by HAWC/AOS for a healthy and climate-resilient Canada.
Detailed definitions of eligible activities under each Stream can be found in Appendix B.
3.3 Links to CSA Priorities
To be eligible, projects supported under this AO must contribute to at least one of the primary HAWC/AOS science objectives (Stream 1 and Stream 2) or enabled applications (Stream 3).
Detailed descriptions of these priorities can be found in Appendix C.
3.4 Links to the Class G&C Program Objectives
To be eligible, projects supported under this AO must contribute to the achievement of at least one of the following objectives:
- To support the development of science and technology relevant to the priorities of the CSA;
- To foster the continuing development of a critical mass of researchers and highly qualified people in Canada in areas relevant to the priorities of the CSA;
- To support information gathering, studies and research related to space.
3.5 Research and Development (R&D) Definition
Eligible projects supported under this AO must comply with the following definition for basic R&D:
“Any pre-commercial science and technology activities that are carried out to resolve unknowns regarding the feasibility of (i) space concepts or (ii) applications in the space sector.”
The following due diligence process will be applied to determine whether projects are compliant with this definition:
- Are the scientific unknowns to be answered clearly stated?
- Is there a description of how the expected results will be obtained (methodology)?
- Are the working hypotheses used to solve the scientific unknowns clearly stated?
- Is it clearly demonstrated that the proposed solution consists of more than routine analysis, engineering or current operations?
Basic R&D activities supported under this AO shall be undertaken in Canada unless it is essential to the success of the project.
4 Notice of intent — stage 1
In this section 4
The objective of this stage is to verify the eligibility of the applicant and the project before receiving a full proposal. An applicant who has presented a project summary that meets the eligibility criteria will receive the necessary documentation to submit a full proposal.
In this first stage, the project submitted shall include:
- Documents necessary to verify eligibility of the applicant according to the criteria set out in Section 3.1 of this AO. This includes:
- Proof of incorporation or registration and a copy of the document(s) confirming the legal name of the applicant;
- a copy of the PhD diploma of the lead researcher;
- the signature of the Duly Authorized Representative on the Notice of Intent.
- A description of the project (approximately one page, to a maximum of 1000 words) that allows the CSA to assess the project's eligibility under the criteria listed in Sections 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 of this AO.
- The planned budget request, including third party funding. This is for planning purposes and is not binding.
Submission is done by first completing an account creation request at the electronic proposal portal. Upon account creation, the CSA will send an email with instructions on how to connect to the CSA secure filer system to allow you to upload documents securely. Please note that Google Chrome is the browser of choice for submissions. Applicants are encouraged to create their account several days before the submission deadline, in order to address any technical difficulties that could arise.
Documents must be received at the CSA no later than the notice of intent deadline indicated at the top of this announcement.
4.1 Service Standards — Notice of Intent
Applicants will be notified in writing of decisions about their project. Applicants whose projects meet the eligibility criteria will receive the necessary documentation to submit a full proposal.
Acknowledgement: The CSA's goal is to acknowledge receipt of proposals within 2 weeks of receiving the request. The acknowledgment will be accompanied by the necessary documentation to submit a full proposal or a letter stating that the project is not eligible.
5 Complete applications — stage 2
In this section 5
5.1 Required Documentation
The application must include the following:
- A completed original application form signed by the duly authorized representative, which includes;
- Declaration on Confidentiality, Access to Information Act and Privacy Act form (refer to the Applicant Declaration on Confidentiality, Access to Information Act and Privacy Act section included in the application form), which is integrated in the application form;
- For organizations in Quebec, M-30 Supporting Documentation form completed and signed by the duly authorized representative (refer to the M-30 form for organizations in Quebec), which is integrated in the application form;
- 1 copy of the proposal (up to a maximum of 10 pages);
- Implementation schedule
- Letters from co-researchers and other funding contributors confirming their contributions (if applicable);
- In the scenario where a collaboration with non-funding federal department is planned, a letter from the director general of the collaborating department must be provided. The letter must include a description of the roles and responsibilities of the parties, and an estimate of costs to be incurred by the federal department, including salaries.
- Any other documentation supporting the activities proposed within the project.
The application must be prepared as a single PDF-formatted file containing all of the above requested documents with all security features disabled. Please order the document with the application form and proposal first. The proposal and supporting documents must be included in the file as searchable PDF-formatted documents (PDF/A-1a or PDF/A-2a formats preferred). If there are any accessibility issues with the submitted PDF file, all consequences reside with the applicant.
Any missing supporting document or any incoherence between the requested documents and the information provided within the documents may lead to the rejection of the proposal on that sole basis.
It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the application complies with all relevant federal, provincial and territorial legislation and municipal bylaws.
Submission is done by using the same account created for submitting the NoI, and documents shared through the same secure portal. Please note that Google Chrome is the browser of choice for submissions. Applicants are encouraged to create their account several days before the submission deadline, in order to address any technical difficulties that could arise.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to upload their applications well before the submission deadline.
- Full proposals must be received at CSA no later than the closing date and time indicated at the top of this AO page.
- Applications sent by email or as email attachments will not be accepted.
- Incomplete applications shall not be considered.
Questions and answers related to this AO will be posted on the CSA website in the “Frequently Asked Questions” of this AO (Section 10).
5.2 Service Standards — Complete Applications
Applicants will be notified in writing of decisions regarding their application. Selected applications will be announced on the CSA website. The CSA has set the following service standards for processing times, acknowledgement of receipt, funding decisions and payment procedures.
Acknowledgement: The CSA's goal is to acknowledge receipt of proposals within 2 weeks of receiving a completed application package.
Decision: The CSA's goal is to respond to the proposal within 16 weeks of the AO cycle's closing date and to send a grant agreement for signature within 4 weeks after formal approval of the proposal.
Payment: The CSA's goal is to issue payment within 4 weeks of the successful fulfillment of the requirements outlined in the grant agreement.
Compliance with these service standards is a shared responsibility. Applicants must submit all required documentation in a timely fashion. Service standards may vary by Announcement of Opportunity.
6 Evaluation
In this section 6
6.1 Eligibility Criteria
- Represents an eligible recipient as defined in Section 3.1;
- Represents an eligible project as defined in Sections 3.2, 3.3, 3.4;
- Meets the basic R&D definition in Section 3.5; and
- Meets program funding provisions as defined in Section 7.1.
6.2 Evaluation Criteria
Applications will be evaluated according to the following criteria. These are further described in Appendix A.
| Criteria | Description | Score | Minimum Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | |||
| Benefits to Canada (30%) | Priority Alignment | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 15 pts |
| Merit of Project | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | ||
| Results (30%) | Development of HQP | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 15 pts |
| Application of Results | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | ||
| Feasibility (20%) | Methodology Feasibility | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 pts |
| Schedule Feasibility | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | ||
| Risk and Mitigation | 10 | 7 | 4 | 0 | ||
| Resources (20%) | Research Team | 10 | 7 | 4 | 0 | pts |
| Budget | 10 | 7 | 4 | 0 | ||
The minimum overall score required to be considered for funding is 60 points.
6.3 Evaluation Process
Only applications that have passed the eligibility assessment listed in Section 6.1 will be given further consideration.
Once the eligibility criteria are confirmed, evaluators will assess the screened applications according to the criteria listed in Section 6.2. Evaluators shall be experts in the fields relevant to the applications and may include representatives of Canada and other countries, and representatives of other government and non-government agencies and organizations. If applicable, a multidisciplinary evaluation committee will be formed when applications from several different disciplines are competing in order to provide a uniform final score and ranking of proposals.
Before a final decision is made, the CSA's Program Manager responsible for this AO may seek input and advice from other organizations, including (but not limited to) federal, provincial, territorial and municipal government agencies and organizations.
The results obtained in this AO could take into account certain factors in the final decision to grant funding, such as, but not limited to, the representativeness of the four designated groups (woman, Indigenous person, disabled person or member of a visible minority), regional distribution, academic level, distribution between universities and post-secondary educational institutions, etc. Please visit the Employment Equity site for a complete definition of each group.
7 Funding
In this section 7
7.1 Available Funding
The maximum annual funding per grant agreement to an eligible recipient under Streams 2 and 3 is $90,000 per year, up to a total of $270,000. This information is summarized in the table below:
| Stream | Maximum annual funding per grant agreement |
|---|---|
| 1. Advancing primary HAWC/AOS science objectives by conducting ground-based and/or airborne data collection | $0 per year |
| 2. Advancing primary HAWC/AOS science objectives by conducting model development and/or data analysis | $90,000 per year |
| 3. Advancing applications enabled by HAWC/AOS for a healthy and climate-resilient Canada | $90,000 per year |
The CSA reserves the right to reject any proposals or reduce the amount of the grants or the contributions at its entire discretion.
The number of projects under this AO will depend on funding availability. Submitted proposals should plan to be completed within a maximum period of three (3) years.
An applicant (university or post-secondary institution) may be funded for more than one (1) project under this AO provided each project has a different Lead Researcher or targets different Streams.
A researcher can only be the Lead Researcher for one (1) active grant per Stream under this AO at any given time. A Lead Researcher with an active grant under one of this AO's Streams may submit a new proposal to a different Stream under this AO. A Lead Researcher with an active grant under one of this AO's Streams may also submit a new proposal to the same AO Stream in the final year of their existing grant so long as their existing grant will conclude prior to the commencement of the proposed work.
Approved proposals will be eligible for a total amount of government assistance (federal, provincial, territorial and municipal) of up to 100% of total project costs. To determine the amount of funding to be allocated, consideration will be given to the availability of CSA funds, the total cost of the project, and the other confirmed sources of funds provided by other stakeholders and the applicant.
Applicants must identify all sources of funding in their applications and confirm this information in a funding agreement if the project is selected for funding. Upon completion of a project, the recipient must also disclose all sources of funding.
7.2 Eligible Costs
Eligible costs are direct expenses that are associated with the delivery of the approved project and that are required to achieve the expected results of the project. Expenses will be covered subject to the applicant signing a funding agreement, in the form of a grant, with the CSA.
Eligible costs for grants under this AO are the following:
- Access fees;
- Accommodation and meal allowances (The authorized allowances are $600 / day for all destinations. They include accommodation, meals, incidentals, and local transportation. Allowances are also applicable for the day of departure and arrival);
- Acquisition, development and printing of materials;
- Acquisition or rental of equipment;
- Aircraft and watercraft charter services;
- Bursaries;
- Consultant services (not to exceed 30% of eligible costs);
- Costs related to obtaining security clearance;
- Data acquisition;
- Data management;
- Laboratory analysis services;
- License and permit fees;
- Marketing and printing services;
- Materials and supplies;
- Overhead (administrative) costs (not to exceed 10% of eligible costs for Stream 1 and 15% for Stream 2 and Stream 3);
- Participation fees at conferences, committees and events;
- PST, HST and GST net of any rebate to which the recipient is entitled and the reimbursement of any taxes for goods and services acquired in a foreign country net of any rebate or reimbursement received in the foreign country;
- Publication and communication services;
- Registration fees;
- Salaries and benefits;
- Training;
- Translation services;
- Travel (Eligible expenses include round-trip economy class air tickets or the cost of another, more economical mode of transportation. The rates payable in cents per kilometre for the use of privately owned vehicles must follow Treasury Board rates, Appendix B. Travel expenses shall be in direct relation to the project (ex. Field work, project meetings). Proponent must indicate the number of trips and the number of days for each trip, the cost, destination, and purpose of each journey, together with the basis of these costs); and
- Tuition fees.
8 Funding agreements
In this section 8
8.1 Payments
The CSA and each successful applicant (the recipient) will sign a funding agreement. This is a condition for any payment made by the CSA with respect to the approved project.
For grant agreements, payments will be made in a lump sum or instalments as described in the signed agreement. Grant funding agreements will include a clause stipulating the recipient's obligation to confirm—once a year in the case of multi-year agreements—their eligibility for the G&C Program - Research Component and inform the CSA in writing of any changes to the conditions used in determining their eligibility for this component.
8.2 Audit
The recipient of a funding agreement shall keep proper records of all documentation related to the funded project, for the duration of the project and for six (6) years after the completion date of the project, in the event of an audit. This documentation shall be available upon request.
8.3 Conflict of Interest
In the funding agreement, the recipient will certify that any current or former public office holder or public servant it employs complies with the provisions of the relevant Conflict of Interest and Post-Employment Code for Public Office Holders and the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector respectively.
8.4 Intellectual Property
All intellectual property developed by the recipient in the course of the project shall vest in the recipient.
8.5 Organizations in Quebec
An organization in Quebec whose operations are partially or fully funded by the province of Quebec may be subject to the Act Respecting the Ministère du Conseil exécutif, CQLR c M-30.
Under Sections 3.11 and 3.12 of this Act, certain entities/organizations, as defined in the meaning of the Act, such as municipal bodies, school bodies, or public agencies, must obtain authorization from the Secrétariat du Québec aux relations canadiennes (SQRC), as indicated by the Act, before signing any funding agreement with the Government of Canada, its departments or agencies, or a federal public agency.
Consequently, any entity that is subject to the Act is responsible for obtaining such authorization before signing any funding agreement with the Government of Canada.
Quebec applicants must complete, sign and include the M-30 Supporting Documentation form with their application.
8.6 Performance Measurement
The CSA will ask the recipients to report on certain aspects of their projects such as:
Knowledge Creation
- Knowledge production (including publications)
- Presentations
- Intellectual property (including patents)
Capacity Building
- Project's research team (including highly qualified personnel supported)
Collaboration
- Partners' contributions
- Partnerships
- Multidisciplinarity
8.7 Open Access Publications
In the event that publications result from the project, the CSA wishes to promote the dissemination of findings that result from the projects it funds as quickly and to the greatest number of people as possible. Improved access to scientific results not only allows scientists to use a broader range of resources and knowledge, but also improves research collaboration and coordination, strengthens citizen engagement and supports the economy.
Thus, the CSA promotes the use of open access publication and archiving by recipients in order to facilitate the widest dissemination of findings that results from its funded projects. Thus, recipients are invited to publish, in a timely matter, their articles by using one of the following methods:
- Accessible online repository (institutional or disciplinary) so that the publication is freely accessible.
- Journal offering open access to articles.
It should be noted that these two methods are not mutually exclusive and that recipients are encouraged to use both.
Finally, the CSA wishes to receive, as a courtesy, a copy of the publications (if not freely accessible) or the hyperlink (if freely accessible) and its digital object identifier (DOI). These will be used to improve accessibility by including them in the CSA publications directory.
9 Privacy notice statement
The CSA manages and protects the information provided by the applicant under the Privacy Act and the Access to Information Act. By submitting your personal information, you consent to its collection, use and disclosure in accordance with the following Privacy Statement, which explains how the information about the applicant will be processed.
The information is collected under the CSA Class Grants and Contributions Program in Support of Awareness, Research and Learning - Research Component (ASC PPU 045) and Awareness and Learning Component (ASC PPU 040). This information will be used for administration and application evaluation purposes. Personal information (such as name, contact information and biographical information) will be kept for 6 years and destroyed. According to the Privacy Act, any individual may, upon request, (1) have access to his or her personal data and (2) request correction of the incorrect information.
Applicants should also note that information relating to the Funding Agreement could be disclosed publicly in accordance with the laws, policies and directives of the Government of Canada.
For additional information regarding this statement, please contact:
Office of Access to Information and Privacy
Canadian Space Agency
Tel.: 514-378-6174
Email: aiprp-atip@asc-csa.gc.ca
10 Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
It is the responsibility of the applicants to obtain clarification of the requirements contained herein, if necessary, before submitting an application.
For any questions related to the AO, applicants shall use the following email address: AVENIR-HAWC-science@asc-csa.gc.ca. Questions and answers related to this AO will be posted on the CSA website in the Frequently Asked Questions section of this AO. The CSA will respond to questions received before 17:00 ET, 10 business days prior to the closing date of any given cycle.
-
Question 1: Who is my Duly Authorized Representative?
Answer 1: Ask your office of research to find out who the Duly Authorize Representative is at your institution.
-
Question 2: Can a proposal requesting less funding than the maximum eligible amount per agreement be submitted?
Answer 2: Yes. There is no minimum threshold on the budget. The budget should be aligned with the scope of the proposal.
-
Question 3: In the spirit of collaboration, can multiple institutions organize themselves to submit separate proposals that fit within the total AO envelope?
Answer 3: Yes. All proposals will be evaluated individually. Each proposal must respect the eligibility criteria and must include separate, nonoverlapping activities and costs.
-
Question 4: Are transport fees related to the transport of instruments required during a field campaign considered eligibles expenses?
Answer 4: : Yes. Data acquisition includes the cost to acquire data, including satellite imagery data and data portal subscription fees, required to perform the project commensurate with project scope. It also includes ancillary costs not covered elsewhere to acquire (collect) data in the field.
-
Question 5: What constitute "consultant services"?
Answer 5: The nature of services to be acquired shall be set out in the proposal estimates and the consultant must perform specific tasks only (not for the project as a whole). The amount eligible for a consultant shall be the actual contract amount. The CSA reserves the right to approve only a portion of the consultant fees submitted.
-
Question 6: Are student stipends eligible under “Salaries and benefits”?
Answer 6: Stipends or financial compensation for certain fees paid to students for their contribution to a project, are eligible costs that must be claimed under the heading "bursaries".
-
Question 7: Can a proposal include transfer of funds between partner institutions or reimbursement of expenses incurred by partner institutions?
Answer 7: No. All eligible expenses for a project must be incurred and paid by the recipient with which the CSA has a grant agreement. For example, if support from other institutions is required for field work detailed in the proposal, travel expenses for these external participants must be paid for directly by the recipient in order to be eligible expenses. It is not allowed for the recipient to reimburse another participant for expenses incurred by the latter.
-
Question 8: Is this Announcement of Opportunity open to any airborne campaigns?
Answer 8: No. This announcement of opportunity is ONLY open to projects that will contribute to advance primary High-altitude Aerosols, Water vapour and Clouds (HAWC)/NASA's Atmosphere Observing System (AOS) mission's science objectives. For other projects, please check CSA's Opportunities page.
-
Question 9: Can a proposal submitted for this announcement of opportunity also be submitted for the Flights and Fieldwork for the Advancement of Science and Technology (FAST) opportunity?
Answer 9: For this cycle, HAWC-related projects can only be funded through this announcement of opportunity and will not be eligible for the Flights and Fieldwork for the Advancement of Science and Technology (FAST) funding.
-
Question 10: Can a government researcher be included as a co-investigator in the application?
Answer 10: yes, a government researcher can be included as a co-investigator in the application. However, no funding transfer is authorized to any other entity outside of the Applicant. A government researcher can apply as a Principal Investigator if they are affiliated to an eligible institution (the applicant), i.e., they are Adjunct Faculty.
-
Question 11: How should the NoI documents be transferred, and where should the Duly Authorized Representative (DAR) sign? How will I know my documents have been received?
Answer 11: The NoI documents should be transferred through the PIE-ISEP platform, with the link received by email after the account creation. It is suggested to merge all documents in a single pdf file, and have the DAR sign this document, wherever is most visible and practical. A confirmation email will be sent after CSA receives the documents, and a confirmation of eligibility will follow.
-
Question 12: Will CSA provide PONEX data to applicants who request it?
Answer 12: No, CSA will not provide data. It is up to the applicants to establish collaborations ensuring they have access to PONEX data.
11 Appendix a: evaluation criteria definition, scale rating, and scores
In this section 11
Scoring
Each criterion will be rated on a letter scale from A to D, with A being the highest score. A numerical weight is associated with each letter.
There is an overall minimum score of 60 to pass, as well as an individual minimum requirement on all criteria individually. The applicant is advised to read Evaluation Criteria carefully when preparing the proposal.
11.1 Benefits to Canada
Maximum: 30
Minimum: 15
11.1.1 Priority Alignment
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate how well the proposal aligns with the CSA priorities selected by the applicant. The CSA priorities are described in Appendix C for each Stream. Only one Stream may be selected on the AO application form. The proposal will be evaluated according to the corresponding priorities.
- Poor
The proposal makes no mention of, and does not align with any of the chosen CSA priorities. (Score: D=0)
- Average
The proposal superficially relates to topics outlined in the chosen CSA priorities. (Score: C=5)
- Good
The proposal specifically references elements of the chosen CSA priorities, and aligns well with at least one of those priorities. (Score: B=10)
- Excellent
The proposal is central to the chosen CSA priorities. It references and aligns well with multiple priorities therein. (Score: A=15)
11.1.2 Merit of Project
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate if the proposal demonstrates the proposed work to be innovative, impactful, and novel.
- Poor
The proposed work is not original and/or has no conceivable impact on the relevant field of study and/or does not correspond to any ARL. (Score: D=0)
- Average
The proposed work contains few new ideas of significance. This work will have minor impact to the relevant field of study. If applicable, ARL is clearly mentioned. (Score: C=5)
- Good
The proposed work is original. It will meaningfully contribute to the relevant field of study. If applicable, ARL is clearly mentioned. (Score: B=10)
- Excellent
The proposed work will address key questions and significantly advance the relevant field of study. If applicable, ARL is clearly mentioned. (Score: A=15)
11.2 Results
Maximum: 30
Minimum: 15
11.2.1 Development of Highly Qualified Personnel (HQP)
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate to what degree graduate students and early-career researchers will contribute to the proposed research. Proposals should include a development plan that describes how the HQP will be mentored to acquire the desired competencies. In this context, early-career researchers must have completed their most recent degree within the past five years and must hold a bachelor's degree.
- Poor
Graduate students and/or early-career researchers will play no part the proposed work. (Score: D=0)
- Average
Graduate students and/or early-career researchers will play a minor role in the proposed work. (Score: C=5)
- Good
Graduate students and/or early-career researchers will play a significant role in the proposed work. (Score: B=10)
- Excellent
Graduate students and/or early-career researchers will play a central role in the proposed work. The proposal presents an approach that explicitly supports EDI (equity, diversity and inclusion) goals. (Score: A=15)
11.2.2 Application of Results
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate the likelihood that the proposed work will provide a near-term benefit to the relevant stakeholders. In this context stakeholder could be government agencies, the scientific community, or the HAWC/AOS initiative that the proposed project is supporting.
- Poor
The proposal does not demonstrate how the proposed work will benefit the stakeholders. (Score: D=0)
- Average
The proposal demonstrates that the proposed work has the potential to benefit someday the stakeholder. (Score: C=5)
- Good
The proposal demonstrates that the proposed work will benefit the stakeholders in the near future. (Score: B=10)
- Excellent
The proposal demonstrates that the proposed work will immediately and significantly benefit the stakeholders. (Score: A=15)
11.3 Feasibility
Maximum: 20
Minimum: 10
11.3.1 Methodology Feasibility
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate how appropriate the proposed methodology is for achieving the goals of the proposed work.
- Poor
The proposed methodology is inappropriate for the goals of the proposal. (Score: D=0)
- Average
The proposed methodology is likely to achieve some of the proposal's goals. (Score: C=2)
- Good
The proposed methodology is likely to achieve most of the proposal's goals. (Score: B=4)
- Excellent
The proposed methodology is likely to achieve all of the proposal's goals. (Score: A=5)
11.3.2 Schedule Feasibility
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate how well the proposal demonstrates that the proposed work will be completed within the duration of the grant.
- Poor
The proposal does not include a work schedule. (Score: D=0)
- Average
The proposed work schedule is either unreasonable or does not include sufficient detail to judge accurately. (Score: C=2)
- Good
The proposed work schedule is mostly complete and reasonable. However, it is unclear if all proposed work will be completed during the grant. (Score: B=4)
- Excellent
The proposed work schedule is complete and reasonable. All goals listed in the proposal will likely be completed during the grant (Score: A=5)
11.3.3 Risk and mitigation
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate how well the proposal identifies potential risks associated with the proposed scope of work, as well as mitigation strategies for those risks. Possible risks could include difficulty hiring appropriate HQP, loss of HQP to the project, difficulty acquiring needed parts, delay in mission launch, change in data availability, etc.
- Poor
The proposal does not include a risk analysis and mitigation strategy. (Score: D=0)
- Average
The proposal lists at least one credible risk to the completion of the proposed work, including an effective mitigation strategy for that risk. (Score: C=4)
- Good
The proposal lists credible risks to the completion of the proposed work, including effective mitigation strategies for those risks identified. However, the proposal has omitted at least one significant risk to the proposed work that is apparent to the reviewer. (Score: B=7)
- Excellent
The proposal lists effective mitigation strategies for all risks to the completion of the proposed work. The proposal has not omitted any significant risks to the proposed work that are apparent to the reviewer. (Score: A=10)
11.4 Ressources
Maximum: 20
Minimum: 11
11.4.1 Research team
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate the expertise of the research team in fields relevant to the proposed work.
- Poor
The research team has little or no experience in the relevant fields of study. (Score: D=0)
- Average
The research team has experience in related fields. However, it is missing several skillsets key to completion of the proposed work. (Score: C=4)
- Good
The research team has some experience in the relevant fields of study, and is well suited for the proposed work. (Score: B=7)
- Excellent
The research team has significant experience in all fields relevant to the proposed research, and contains world-class expertise in certain domains. In support of EDI (equity, diversity and inclusion), at least one member of the research team indicates that they belong to one or more of the four following groups: women, Indigenous People, persons with disabilities and member of visibility minority. (Score: A=10)
11.4.2 Budget
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate if the budget provided with the proposal is complete and feasible.
- Poor
The proposal does not include a budget. (Score: D=0)
- Average
The proposed budget appears reasonable but does not include sufficient detail to judge accurately. (Score: C=4)
- Good
The proposed budget is mostly complete and reasonable. The amount requested is reasonable for completion of the proposed work. (Score: B=7)
- Excellent
The budget in the proposal provides sufficient detail to describe accurately the use of the requested funds. The amount requested is reasonable for completion of the proposed work. (Score: A=10)
Evaluation score
Maximum score: 100
Minimum passing score: 60
12 Appendix b: eligible activities definition
In this section 12
- 12.1 Stream 1: Advancing primary HAWC/AOS science objectives by conducting ground-based and/or airborne data collection
- 12.2 Stream 2: Advancing primary HAWC/AOS science objectives by conducting model development and/or data analysis
- 12.3 Stream 3: Advancing applications enabled by HAWC/AOS for a healthy and climate-resilient Canada
This AO supports a variety of activities. The categories listed below separate types of activities according to each AO Stream. Applicants should mark on their application form with which Stream their project aligns.
12.1 Stream 1: Advancing primary HAWC/AOS science objectives by conducting ground-based and/or airborne data collection
To meet eligibility with this activity, the project must:
- focus on at least one of the HAWC/AOS research priorities indicated in section 13.1 (see Appendix C);
- include science investigation or use of a technology during a flight or field deployment; and
- include atmospheric data collection.
12.2 Stream 2: Advancing primary HAWC/AOS science objectives by conducting model development and/or data analysis
To meet eligibility with this activity, the project must:
- focus on at least one of the HAWC/AOS research priorities indicated in section 13.1 (see Appendix C);
- include science investigation using numerical models and/or any combination of satellite, airborne or ground-based data; and
- include atmospheric data analysis.
An eligible example may involve analysis of data obtained during the PONEX campaign, to pursue one of the objectives in section 13.1 (Appendix C).
12.3 Stream 3: Advancing applications enabled by HAWC/AOS for a healthy and climate-resilient Canada
Stream 3 of the ROHSSA initiative is aimed at supporting the development of innovative applications concepts from the HAWC/AOS initiative through their Research & Development phases. The Application Readiness Level (ARL) system used to assess the progress of an application is comprised of the following structure:
Application Readiness Level Scale, with nine progressive levels, ranging foundational concept to commercialization - Text version
Long description:
Application Readiness Level Scale, with nine progressive levels, ranging foundational concept to commercialization.
- Facilitate and Implement (Mature Levels to provide solution)
- Demonstrate and Validate (Mid-Levels to confirm the concept)
- Explore and Create (Early Levels to identify the approach options)
Progressive ARL Advancement
- Ready-to-Use Products and Services (Commercialization)
- Practical Implementation (Operational Use)
- Refined Application Solution (tailored Solution)
- Demonstration in the Application Environment (Confirmation)
- Validation in the Application Context (Concept Feasibility)
- Concept Development (Proof of Concept)
- Selection of Preferred Approach (Logic Based)
- Consideration of Innovative Concepts (State-of-the-Art)
- Identification of the Application (Foundational Concept)
These early to mid-stage phases represent the most challenging steps in creating new applications solutions and are therefore deserving of unique support and assistance. Although ARLs 6 and 9 are recognized as being very important for the ultimate success of a product or service, they go beyond the focus of the ROHSSA initiative.
To meet eligibility with this activity, the project must:
- focus on the development of at least one of the enabled HAWC/AOS applications indicated in section 13.2 (see Appendix C) up to a maximum of ARL 5;
- include science investigation using numerical models and/or any combination of satellite, airborne or ground-based data; and
- include atmospheric data analysis
An eligible example may involve assimilation of Earth Cloud Aerosol and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE) data to pursue one of the priorities in section 13.2 (Appendix C).
The applicant should clearly identify the current state-of-the-art and its corresponding ARL, and then identify the target ARL that the research intends to achieve. A project can also remain within the same ARL for the duration of the project, but should still demonstrate an advancement. The following subsections provide a definition of each of the relevant ARLs.
12.3.1 Application Readiness Level 1
Identification of the Application - Foundational Concepts
This initial level is at the origin of identification for any innovative idea, leading to creative approaches that will potentially resolve challenges for an application in everyday life using space-based data in a Canadian context that may also have beneficial implications for the international community. At this stage a clear understanding of the application and the challenges it faces are summarized.
- Milestones to Accomplish
- Identifying the application with challenges in need of an improvement or solution;
- Recognizing the fundamental nature of the application, including the underlying theory and dynamics in relation to space-based data.
- Key Components
- Provide a comprehensive summary of the application and the challenges it faces, including applicable theory and dynamics, and its relevance to space data;
- Summarize the current importance and impact of the application to society.
12.3.2 Application Readiness Level 2
Consideration of Innovative Concepts - State-of-the-Art
ARL-2 Maturity Level is the stage where innovative concepts are reviewed within the state-of-the-art for the application, and options for a potential solution are considered.
- Milestones to Accomplish
- Clear understanding of the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) in relation to the chosen application;
- Review of the possible approach options that could result in a potential improvement to or eventual solution for the application. This may include new methods, systems, products or services.
- Key Components
- Provide a comprehensive summary of the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) in relation to the chosen application with a relevant literature review;
- Identify the shortcomings in the current SOTA and the gaps that need to be filled;
- Summarize the approach options for a potential improvement to or eventual solution for the application.
12.3.3 Application Readiness Level 3
Selection of Preferred Approach — Logic Based
Formulation of the concept and proposed approach for the chosen application that is based on sound principles and justifications, including a summary of all of the necessary concept elements and resources related to the development of the approach. The preferred approach should also summarize the innovation that has been introduced by the concept.
- Milestones to Accomplish
- Clear rationale for the selection of the proposed approach including the development plan;
- Explanation as to how the proposed approach is an improvement over current approaches for the application.
- Key Components
- Provide a logic-based justification for the selection of the proposed approach, including the basic underlying assumptions;
- Summarize the methodology to be used, including all of the necessary program elements;
- Identify the specific improvements and innovations that the approach will create.
12.3.4 Application Readiness Level 4
Concept Development - Proof of Concept
The concept at this stage will be in a preliminary state whereby the key aspects of its main operating characteristics will have been determined and proven initially reliable for the selected application, but which has not yet been tested or validated in an operational context under a variety of conditions.
- Milestones to Accomplish
- Individual components or aspects of the approach have been developed;
- Plan for the integration and validation of the approach components has been made;
- Risks with mitigation and corrective strategies have been considered.
- Key Components
- The main aspects of the approach have been developed and preliminary tests successfully completed;
- Refinements to the approach have been justified and made;
- Individual components have been integrated into the overall system to confirm their viability.
12.3.5 Application Readiness Level 5
Validation in the Application Context - Concept Feasibility
The basic components of the products, methods or service are integrated together into a prototype concept that will be validated against a real world application to identify and correct any outstanding shortcomings or modifications that may have to be made to ensure feasibility of the concept prior to moving to the next level.
- Milestones to Accomplish
- The integrated components are to be validated and verified against empirical data related to the application;
- Based on the validation process and its results, changes to the approach may be made.
- Key Components
- The feasibility of the concept has to be demonstrated using empirical or simulated data for the application;
- Any changes to the approach should be created and also demonstrated;
- The level of success should be quantifiable and realistically evaluated for the application, identifying its impact on the application.
13 Appendix c: objectives and priorities
In this section 13
13.1 Primary HAWC/AOS science objectives
Applicants targeting Stream 1 or Stream 2 should demonstrate within the body of their proposal the alignment of their project with one or many of the following primary HAWC/AOS science objectives, as per point-rated evaluation criterion 11.1.1 in Appendix A.
| O1 Low Clouds | Minimum: Determine the sensitivity of boundary layer bulk cloud physical and radiative properties to large-scale and local environmental factors including thermodynamic and dynamic properties. Enhanced: Adds to Minimum cloud microphysical properties and enhanced bulk cloud properties |
|---|---|
| O2 High Clouds | Minimum:
Enhanced: Adds to Minimum microphysical properties of ice clouds. |
| O3 Convective Storm Systems | Minimum: Relate vertical motion within convective storms to their:
Enhanced: Improve measurements of convective storm vertical motion and storm characteristics in (a) and (b) of the Minimum objective to better address deep convection and diurnal variability. Further relate items in the Minimum objective to latent heating profiles, storm life cycle, ambient aerosol profiles, and surface properties. |
| O4 Cold Cloud and Precipitation Processes | Minimum: Detect and quantify vertically integrated amounts of ice and liquid condensate (including precipitation) and relate these to vertical structure, cloud physical and radiative properties (including mixed-phase precipitation and snowfall), meteorological forcing and regime, orography, and surface properties. Enhanced: Enhancement of Minimum with an additional focus on:
|
| O5 Aerosol Attribution and Air-Quality | Minimum: Quantify optical and microphysical aerosol properties in the planetary boundary layer (PBL) and free troposphere to improve process understanding, estimates of aerosol emissions, speciation, and predictions of near-surface particulate matter concentrations. Enhanced: Characterize variations in vertical profiles of optical and microphysical properties over space and time in terms of 3D transport, spatially resolved emission sources and residual production and loss terms. |
| O6 Aerosol Wet Removal, Vertical Redistribution and Processing | Minimum: Relate the vertical structure of aerosol properties to cloud and precipitation properties to improve understanding of processes impacting aerosol vertical transport, removal, and overall lifecycle in light and moderate precipitation regimes (less than 5 mm/hr). Enhanced: Extend minimum to include heavy precipitation regimes (more than 5 mm/hr), aerosol processing (including gaseous and aqueous production) and vertical transport to the Upper Troposphere - Lower Stratosphere (UTLS) region |
| O7 Aerosol Direct Effects and Absorption | Minimum: Reduce uncertainties in estimates of:
Enhanced: Quantify the impact of absorbing aerosols on vertically resolved aerosol radiative heating rates and DRE commensurate with the uncertainties in global mean at TOA and surface. |
| O8 Aerosol Indirect Effect | Minimum: Provide measurements to constrain process level understanding of aerosol-warm cloud interactions to improve estimates of aerosol indirect radiative forcing. Enhanced: Provide measurements to constrain process level understanding of interactions of aerosol with cold and mixed phase clouds to improve estimates of aerosol indirect radiative forcing. |
13.2 Enabled HAWC/AOS applications
Applicants targeting Stream 3 should demonstrate within the body of their proposal the alignment of their project with one or many of the following enabled HAWC/AOS applications, as per point-rated evaluation criterion 11.1.1 in Appendix A.
| 1. Disaster Monitoring and Modeling | 1.1 Disaster modeling: Volcanic plume, smoke aerosol vertical distribution and extent for transport modeling, aviation, public health |
|---|---|
| 1.2 Disaster monitoring and modeling: flood, landslide, post-fire debris flow | |
| 1.3 Disaster risk: Parametric and risk modeling (Reinsurance, microinsurance) | |
| 2. Air Quality and Health (Public and Ecosystem) | 2.1 Air Quality Rule and Regulation Making: Determining patterns of air pollution exposure to determine impacts of regulations, areas that need greater monitoring efforts, conduct source apportionment |
| 2.2 Estimating air pollution: exposure and impact on health outcomes to assess health risks | |
| 2.3 Health and Ecological Forecasting/Monitoring: Vector- and water-borne disease monitoring/modeling (e.g. malaria). | |
| 2.4 Health insurance and reinsurance, e.g., pollution exposure risks | |
| 2.5 Operational Air Quality Forecasting: Air Quality Alerting and monitoring for extreme air quality events | |
| 3. Infrastructure and Development | 3.1 Energy Planning: Estimate radiative fluxes for solar insolation (e.g., rainfall over time to remove dust from panels, deposition of acidic aerosols, dust/aerosol warnings/forecast to rotate/close panels). Estimate wind availability for wind energy production. |
| 3.2 Energy Planning: Hydropower potential and modeling | |
| 3.3 Transportation and logistics: supply chain, road network maintenance, urban planning | |
| 4. Water Resources and Agriculture | 4.1 Agricultural modeling and monitoring: Water Resource Management influencing freshwater availability |
| 4.2 Hydrologic Modeling: drought analysis/forecasting for fire weather, agriculture, and ecosystem health | |
| 4.3 Hydrologic Modeling: Total water fluxes at watershed including snowmelt, snow cover, and watershed analysis for irrigation | |
| 5. Weather, Air Quality, and Climate Modeling and Forecasting | 5.1 Aerosol & Precipitation Interactions: Air Quality modeling and forecasting (transport, scavenging, wet deposition, dry deposition, chemical transformation) |
| 5.2 Air Quality Forecasting: Forecast initialization and verification | |
| 5.3 Climate Modeling: Global Climate Smoke Aerosol Transport and Aerosol and Aerosol/Cloud Feedback | |
| 5.4 Climate Modeling: Parametrization of clouds, particle distribution for aerosols and precipitation | |
| 5.5 Operational Air Quality Forecasting: Tracking dust, wildfire smoke, and volcanic plumes | |
| 5.6 Numerical Weather Prediction: Coupling of aerosols within Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) modeling | |
| 5.7 Numerical Weather Prediction: Development & Verification of Cloud/Convective Parametrizations | |
| 5.8 Numerical Weather Prediction: Representation of initial conditions and data assimilation | |
| 5.9 Weather Forecasting: Atmospheric Rivers | |
| 5.10 Weather Forecasting: Aviation hazards related low clouds and fog, smoke, dust or icing | |
| 5.11 Weather Forecasting: Monitoring and nowcasting of convective storms and hazards | |
| 5.12 Weather Forecasting: Pre-fire weather monitoring for wildfire response and management. | |
| 5.13 Weather Forecasting: Tropical cyclone development and forecasting |