– Annual Report to Parliament - Access to Information Act
On this page
- Introduction
- Organizational Structure
- Performance in –
- Highlights of the – Statistical Report
- Access to Information Fees Reported under the Service Fees Act
- Training and Awareness
- Electronic Tools
- Policies, Guidelines, Procedures, and Initiatives
- Summary of key issues and action taken regarding complaints or audits
- Compliance Monitoring
- Conclusion
- Delegation Order
- Statistical Report on the Access to Information Act
© His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry,
ISSN: 2293-9776
Introduction
In this section
The Access to Information Act (the Act) came into effect on . It provides Canadian citizens, permanent residents and all individuals and corporations present in Canada the right of access to records under the control of a government institution, subject to certain specific and limited exceptions. The Act was later amended as a result of Bill C-58 which received Royal Assent on .
Pursuant to section 94, the head of every federal institution shall prepare an annual report on the administration of the Act within each institution and submit to Parliament at the end of each fiscal year. As the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) is subject to the Service Fees Act, this report is also filed in accordance with section 20 of that Act.
This report provides information on the activities of the CSA related to the administration of the Act during the – fiscal year.
Mandate of the Canadian Space Agency
To provide a better understanding of the context in which the Act is implemented at the CSA, this section gives an overview of the CSA's objectives and activities.
The CSA reports to the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development. Its mandate, as set out in the Canadian Space Agency Act, is to "promote the peaceful use and development of space, to advance the knowledge of space through science and to ensure that space science and technology provide social and economic benefits for Canadians."
Mission
The CSA is committed to leading the development and application of space knowledge for the benefit of Canadians and humanity.
To fulfill its mission, the CSA:
- pursues excellence collectively;
- advocates a client-centred attitude;
- supports employee-oriented practices and open communications;
- commits itself to both empowerment and accountability; and
- pledges to cooperate and work with partners for our mutual benefit.
The CSA has been a source of inspiration for Canadians since its creation in . In addition to consolidating major federal space programs, it coordinates all the components of the Canadian Space Program and manages Canada's major space-related activities.
The new Space Strategy for Canada launched in highlighted the importance of space as a strategic national asset and identified harnessing space science and technology as a priority to solve important issues on Earth. This new plan allowed the CSA to undertake a series of initiatives to support the Canadian space industry so it can take full advantage of the growth in the global space sector, while ensuring that Canada keeps pace.
More information on the CSA's activities can be found at: www.asc-csa.gc.ca.
Organizational Structure
In this section
Delegations of Authority
Under the Act, the head of the CSA is the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development. In , some of the powers under the Act were delegated by the Minister to the incumbents of the CSA positions of Vice-President, Chief Information Officer and Access to Information and Open Government Coordinator.
During –, organizational changes were put in place, which resulted in the delegations of authority residing with the positions of the Chief Information Officer and the Access to Information Coordinator. Following these changes in , the Information Management and Technologies Directorate, of which the Office of Access to Information and Personal Information (ATIP) is a part, now reports directly to the President of the CSA.
The updated delegations of authority were approved by the Minister in (see appendix). The appended grid on delegation of authorities identifies the powers delegated.
The Access to Information and Open Government Coordinator is overseen by the Cybersecurity & Information Management Director and is responsible for implementing the Act on a daily basis. The ATIP Office is comprised of the Access to Information and Open Government Coordinator, the Access to Information Senior Officer and a Junior Access to Information Officer.
This office works closely with all sectors of the CSA to ensure the application of and compliance with the Act.
Lastly, the Act allows government institutions to provide services related to access to information to another government institution presided over by the same minister or under the responsibility of the same minister, or to receive such services themselves from any other such institution. However, no agreement for such services, as stipulated in section 96 of the Act, was entered into with any other government institution.
Evolving Role of the ATIP Office
In –, the ATIP Office was mandated not only to process requests under the Act and to report on its administration, but also to implement open government initiatives.
Open government is becoming a global priority in improving transparency and making information more readily available to the public. The Government of Canada is no exception in that regard and has implemented a series of commitments in which departments and agencies are taking part. Briefly, the goal is to release as much data and information as possible in a manner that is accessible, interoperable, and publicly usable. This vision of transparency is closely linked to the vision for the application of the Act.
Further to a decision to link, access to information and open government and open science activities, the ATIP Office has become a one-stop shop for CSA employees wishing to share information and members of the public wishing to obtain information.
This innovative and effective pairing, which resulted from a centralization of activities, has made it possible for the CSA to optimize its acquisition and application of knowledge.
Request Processing Procedure
When it receives a request under the Act, the ATIP Office consults the appropriate Office of Primary Interest and, when necessary and appropriate depending on the case, Justice Canada, the information-related communities of practice, the Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) or other institutions.
The ATIP Office uses an electronic ATIP request processing system to record the administrative actions taken, to review the records in question and to apply any exemptions and exclusions.
Once the documents have been analyzed and the consultations held, the ATIP Office recommends the application of the exemptions to the Chief Information Officer of the CSA, who is responsible for approving the communication of documents disseminated under the Act. The records in response are then sent to the requesters. Lastly, a monthly summary of the completed Access to Information requests are posted on open.canada.ca.
Performance in –
During the reporting period, the CSA processed 79 Access to Information requests, 178 informal requests and 35 consultation requests. Of the 79 Access to Information requests, 96.2% were answered within the time limit prescribed by the Act.
For more details about the processing of requests, please consult the highlights of the statistical report below. The detailed statistical report for to can be found in the appendix.
Highlights of the – Statistical Report
In this section
- Requests Received and Processed
- Sources of Requests
- Informal Requests
- Reasons for Declining to Act on a Request
- Processing Times
- Disposition of Requests
- Exemptions and Exclusions Invoked
- Format of Information Disclosed
- Pages Reviewed and Disclosed
- Consultations
- Consultations Received from Other Federal Institutions
- Consultations Regarding Cabinet Confidences
Requests Received and Processed
Compared with the previous year, the CSA received an increase of Access to Information requests this fiscal year. The number of requests received increased from 57 in - to 78 in -.
In addition to the 78 requests received in –, 8 requests were carried over from the previous year. In total, the CSA processed 79 requests in – and 7 requests were carried over to the next fiscal year.
During the last 5 fiscal years, the CSA has experienced an increase in the number of requests while the number of requests carried forward remains stable.
The following table illustrates the trend in requests:
- | - | - | - | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carried over from previous year | 2 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 7 |
Received during current fiscal year | 17 | 33 | 43 | 58 | 79 |
Sources of Requests
Requests are categorized into six categories according to their source (the media, the public, the academic sector, the private sector, organizations, and declined to identify).
Requests in the media category accounted for 6% of all requests received which represents a decrease compared to 33% in –. As for requests from the public, these slightly decreased from 19% last fiscal year to 8% this year. Additionally, the number of requests increased from the academic sector which was 80% compared with 34% the year before. The category of "decline to identify" was used in 6% of requests, whereas last year was 12%. During the - period there were no applicants which used the category of "organization" or "private sector".
The following table presents sources of the requests:
Public | Media | Declined to identify | Academia | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage | 8% | 6% | 6% | 80% |
Informal Requests
Informal requests are requests that are not filed or processed by a federal institution under the Act, such as requests for records disclosed in response to previous access requests. A list of these previously processed access requests is published every month on the Open Government Portal, making it easier for requesters to find the requests of interest to them and request them from the CSA. No fees can be charged, and this type of request is not subject to a response time. In addition, the Act does not give the requester the right to file a complaint with the Information Commissioner.
The CSA noted an increase in this type of access request since –. However, a more pronounced increase in – coincided with the release of the summaries of completed requests on open.canada.ca. This one-stop portal seems to have contributed to the increase in requests, since requesters can submit them electronically, thus making it easier to access documents that are already published.
The majority (99%) of requests processed informally were submitted through the Treasury Board Secretariat Open Government Portal following the proactive disclosure of completed access requests. In -, a total of 66 requests were submitted through this portal. Only 1 request was received by email which was later divided into 108 individual informal requests.
The number of informal requests processed in – almost doubled compared to the previous year. In fact, 174 requests were received this year compared to 99 last year.
In regard to timelines for responses, 30% of requests were answered within 15 days or less, 12% were answered within 16–30 days and 58% were answered within 61–120 days.
The following chart illustrates the increasing number of informal requests:
- | - | - | - | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of informal requests | 31 | 89 | 50 | 99 | 174 |
Reasons for Declining to Act on a Request
As per section 6.1 of the Act the head of a government institution may request the Information Commissioner investigate a request deemed vexatious, made in bad faith, or an abuse of the right of access. The Information Commissioner of Canada's prior approval is required to refuse a request for access to records.
The CSA did not submit any application to decline to act on a request with the Information Commissioner of Canada in –.
Processing Times
The Act stipulates responses to access and privacy requests must be provided within 30 calendar days. Additionally, the Act provides for the extension of processing times for some requests if, for instance, consultations must be held with third parties or if processing the requests would interfere with the operations of the government institution (for example, a large volume of requests).
Overall, 32 requests representing 41%, received a reply within the original 30 days after a request was received. The other requests required extensions as 46 requests required consultations and 1 request contained a large number of records. Factoring in extensions and responses given within the first 30 days, the CSA ATIP Office completed 76 requests within the legislative time limit which calculates to 96.2%. This result is up from the 82.8% achieved in the previous fiscal year.
The following table illustrates processing times for the - fiscal year:
1 to 15 days | 16 to 30 days | 31 to 60 days | 61 to 120 days | 121 to 180 days | 181 + days | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Requests | 8 | 24 | 34 | 8 | 3 | 2 |
Disposition of Requests
Of the 79 requests processed this year:
- 14 requests (18%) resulted in full disclosure;
- 56 requests (71%) resulted in partial disclosure;
- 1 request (1%) was fully exempted.
In addition, there were 4 requests where no records were located and 4 requests which were abandoned. There were no requests transferred to other departments.
The following table shows all the provisions that were involved:
Number of requests | |
---|---|
All Disclosed |
14 |
Disclosed in Part |
56 |
Request Abandoned |
4 |
No records exist |
4 |
Request transferred |
0 |
All exempted |
1 |
Exemptions and Exclusions Invoked
Within the 79 requests processed this fiscal year a total of 56 requests required an exemption pursuant to the Act.
The most commonly used exemption applied was section 19(1) (personal information) which was applied in 50 instances. The next most commonly applied exemption was section 21(1)(advice) which was applied in 21 instances. The third most applied exemption was section 20(1)(third party) which was applied in 18 instances. Note that more than one exemption and exclusion may apply to a given request.
The following table shows the frequency of exemptions and exclusions invoked in –:
Exemption and exclusion sections | Frequency |
---|---|
13(1) Information obtained in confidence | 10 |
15(1) International affairs and defence | 16 |
16(1) Law enforcement and investigations | 5 |
16(2) Security | 2 |
18 Canada's economic interests | 1 |
19(1) Personal information | 50 |
20(1) Third-party information | 18 |
21(1) Positions or negotiations | 21 |
23 Solicitor/client privilege | 6 |
69(1) Confidences of the Privy Council | 3 |
Format of Information Disclosed
In –, a total of 70 requests resulted in the disclosure of records. All those requests were disclosed electronically. As in previous years, none of the records were consulted in the CSA's reading room.
Pages Reviewed and Disclosed
The number of pages disclosed can vary considerably from year to year, depending on the subject of the requests and the amount of relevant documents held by the CSA.
This year, the number of pages disclosed increased slightly compared to last year. A total of 1970 pages were disclosed in – in comparison to 1665 in –. This small increase is also reflected in the average pages disclosed per request which was 35 pages per request compared to an average of 25 pages in –.
This year, the majority of requests were less than 100 pages in length (88%) which is the same as last year. There were also 3 requests which contained more than 501 pages.
The following table illustrates the trend in number of pages disclosed:
- | - | - | - | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of pages | 1,970 | 1,665 | 814 | 2,139 | 2,984 |
Consultations
The CSA collects some third-party information due to its relationship with different partners in various projects.
The CSA consults third parties and sometimes other federal institutions with the aim of providing as much information as possible, in accordance with the spirit and letter of the Act. Therefore, it is not unusual for the requests processed to consequently require an extension to the legislative time limit. The complexity level is also evidenced by the fact that some requests require consultations with more than one stakeholder.
In –, 45 processed requests were considered complex and required consultations or legal advice. This number is higher than last year where only 30 requests required consultations.
Extensions
The Act allows federal institutions to extend the initial 30-day period in certain specific cases. The deadline may be extended due to a request for a large number of records or necessitates a search through a large number of records. Additionally, large number of records must unreasonably interfere with the operation of the government institution. Secondly, if consultations are necessary to comply with the request or thirdly, if a third party consultation must be undertaken pursuant to subsection 27(1).
This year 46 requests (58%) were extended past the original 30 day time limit compared to 31 requests in –. Of these requests, 1 request contained a large number of records, 2 required consultation due to the application of section 69 [Cabinet confidence] and 43 requests required consultation with other government departments and/or third-party consultations.
As specified in the Act, a notice of extension was sent in each instance to the Information Commissioner of Canada and requester.
Note, the same request may require consultations with correspond to more than one category.
Consultations Received from Other Federal Institutions
In –, the CSA received 35 consultation requests from other departments compared to the previous year as we only received 38 consultations in -.
In addition to the consultation requests received in –, one request was carried forward from the previous year. In total, the CSA completed 34 requests in – and will carry over one consultation to the following fiscal year.
Overall the number of pages processed as part of these consultations has decreased from 3,176 pages in – to 2,250 pages in –. This constitutes a reduction of approximately 1,ooo pages less than what was processed last year. This reduction had an impact on the average pages processed; in fact, in – the average was 83 pages per request, while for the year – the average was 64 pages per request.
Among the completed requests in - the ATIP Office responded to all consultations (100%) in 30 days or less.
More specifically, consultation responses were as follows:
- 21 requests (62%) received a reply within 1 to 15 days;
- 13 consultations (38%) received a reply within 16 to 30 days.
The following table illustrates in the number of consultation requests received over the previous 5 years:
- | - | - | - | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of requests | 32 | 50 | 23 | 38 | 34 |
Consultations Regarding Cabinet Confidences
In -, 2 requests required a consultation with Justice Canada Departmental Legal Services for the application of exclusions pursuant to section 69 of the Act.
Access to Information Fees Reported under the Service Fees Act
The Service Fees Act requires a responsible authority to report to Parliament annually concerning the fees the institution has collected.
As for fees received under the Access to Information Act, the following information is reported in accordance with section 20 of the Service Fees Act.
- Enabling authority: Access to Information Act.
- Fee payable: The five-dollar ($5.00) application fee is the only fee charged for an Access to Information Act request.
- Total revenue: A total of $90 was received for the – fiscal year.
- Fees waived: In accordance with the Interim Directive on the Administration of the Access to Information Act, issued on , the CSA waived all fees prescribed by the Act and the Regulations, other than the five-dollar ($5.00) application fee set out in paragraph 7(1)(a) of the Regulations. During the - reporting period, the application fee was waived for 59 requests an amount of $295. The CSA ATIP Office, along with the requester's consent, agreed it was efficient to divide requests into categories for ease of record retrieval and so the requester may receive responses on a continual basis.
- Program operating costs: Total operating costs were $204,518 for the – fiscal year.
Training and Awareness
In addition to managing requests, the ATIP Office provides all CSA employees with guidance and advice on complying with the Act. This guidance is presented to all CSA employees but also to targeted professional groups such as: Human Resources, Information Technology, Contracting/Procurement, etc. This ensures knowledge of common access to information and privacy principles but also tailored to the mandate of different CSA sectors.
In addition, employees were invited to take the Access to Information and Privacy Fundamentals course (I015) given by the Canada School of Public Service, through its corporate calendar of mandatory and optional training. A total of 5 learners took the training this year.
This year the CSA benefited from the services of a consultant to deliver privacy awareness training throughout the organization. Although the primary purpose was privacy awareness there was some overlap with Access to Information principles as well. The purpose of these training sessions was to raise awareness concerning the role of employees and their responsibilities as they relate to the handing of personal information and the processing of privacy and access requests. In total, more than 300 employees participated in 10 awareness training sessions.
In addition to the courses offered above, employees were also invited to take the Access to Information and Privacy Fundamentals course (I015) given by the Canada School of Public Service. This training is available through its corporate calendar of mandatory and optional training. In -, a total of 5 learners participated in this training course.
Information sessions are also available on the processing of access and privacy requests at the CSA. This training session covers an overview of procedures and responsibilities during the processing of a request. In -, one session was delivered to approximately 19 participants.
Electronic Tools
The CSA continues to use the TBS's Online ATIP Request Service to receive these requests. During -, the ATIP Office participated in training and testing for the new TBS ATIP Online Access Management Portal. The implementation of this tool took place in .
The ATIP Office currently uses an access to information request management tool which was implemented in -. After obtaining this tool, the ATIP Office was able to benefit from its functions which facilitated the production of reports and follow-up of access to information requests. Through TBS procurement, the ATIP Office is preparing for a new system to be implemented in -.
Policies, Guidelines, Procedures, and Initiatives
The CSA's policies, guidelines and procedures for the administration of the Access to Information Act, including section 67.1, are posted on its internal webpage. In –, no changes were made to these documents.
The CSA ATIP Office also participated in TBS inter-departmental working groups to remain up to date on changes to policies, guidelines and directives. The ATIP Office continues to develop internal guidance documents, internal procedures and tools to ensure consistency with best practices in the community.
Summary of key issues and action taken regarding complaints or audits
Complaints
In -, the CSA completed 2 complaints and received 2 new complaints pursuant to section 32 of the Act. In this instance, the complaint alleges that the CSA failed to conduct a reasonable search of records and improperly applied exemptions. At the end of the fiscal year these were the only active complaints.
Compliance Monitoring
Deadlines for processing Access to Information and Privacy requests are tracked through the electronic ATIP request processing system. For CSA reporting purposes, weekly reports are sent to senior management; Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada; and other groups with an interest in the subject of the request.
Conclusion
The CSA Access to Information and Privacy Office continues to implement its mandate to respond to all requests for access to personal information in accordance with the Access to Information and Privacy Act.
Delegation Order
Approved in
Canadian Space Agency
Access to Information Act and Privacy Act Delegation Order
The Minister of Industry, pursuant to subsections 95(1) of the Access to Information Act and 73(1) the Privacy Act, hereby designates the persons holding the positions set out in the schedule hereto, or the persons occupying on an acting basis those positions, to exercise the powers and functions of the Minister as the head of a government institution, under the section of the Acts set out in the schedule opposite each position. This Delegation Order supersedes all previous Delegation Orders
Schedule
Position | Access to information Act and Regulations | Privacy Act and Regulations |
---|---|---|
Chief Information Officer | Full authority | Full authority |
Coordinator Access to Information and Open Data | Full authority | Full authority |
Dated, at the City of Ottawa
This
François-Philippe Champagne
Minister of Industry
Statistical Report on the Access to Information Act
In this section
- Section 1: Requests Under the Access to Information Act
- Section 2: Informal Requests
- Section 3: Applications to the Information Commissioner on Declining to Act on Requests
- Section 4: Requests Closed During the Reporting Period
- Section 5: Extensions
- Section 6: Fees
- Section 7: Consultations Received From Other Institutions and Organizations
- Section 8: Completion Time of Consultations on Cabinet Confidences
- Section 9: Investigations and Reports of finding
- Section 10: Court Action
- Section 11: Resources Related to the Access to Information Act
Name of institution: Canadian Space Agency
Reporting period: to
Section 1: Requests Under the Access to Information Act
1.1 Number of requests
Description | Number of Requests |
---|---|
Received during reporting period | 78 |
Outstanding from previous reporting periods
|
8 |
Total | 86 |
Closed during reporting period | 79 |
Carried over to next reporting period
|
7 |
1.2 Sources of requests
Source | Number of Requests |
---|---|
Media | 5 |
Academia | 62 |
Business (private sector) | 0 |
Organization | 0 |
Public | 6 |
Decline to Identify | 5 |
Total | 78 |
1.3 Channels of requests
Source | Number of Requests |
---|---|
Online | 78 |
0 | |
0 | |
In person | 0 |
Phone | 0 |
Fax | 0 |
Total | 78 |
Section 2: Informal Requests
2.1 Number of informal requests
Description | Number of Requests |
---|---|
Received during reporting period | 174 |
Outstanding from previous reporting periods
|
4 |
Total | 178 |
Closed during reporting period | 178 |
Carried over to next reporting period | 0 |
2.2 Channels of informal requests
Source | Number of Requests |
---|---|
Online | 66 |
108 | |
0 | |
In person | 0 |
Phone | 0 |
Fax | 0 |
Total | 174 |
2.3 Completion time of informal requests
1 to 15 Days | 16 to 30 Days | 31 to 60 Days | 61 to 120 Days | 121 to 180 Days | 181 to 365 Days | More Than 365 Days |
Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
54 | 20 | 104 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 178 |
2.4 Pages released informally
Less Than 100 Pages Released |
100-500 Pages Released |
501-1000 Pages Released |
1001-5000 Pages Released |
More Than 5000 Pages Released |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Requests |
Pages Released |
Number of Requests |
Pages Released |
Number of Requests |
Pages Released |
Number of Requests |
Pages Released |
Number of Requests |
Pages Released |
102 | 1483 | 12 | 2342 | 1 | 814 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2.5 Pages re-released informally
Less Than 100 Pages Re-released |
100-500 Pages Re-released |
501-1000 Pages Re-released |
1001-5000 Pages Re-released |
More Than 5000 Pages Re-released |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Requests |
Pages Re-released |
Number of Requests |
Pages Re-released |
Number of Requests |
Pages Re-released |
Number of Requests |
Pages Re-released |
Number of Requests |
Pages Re-released |
47 | 1204 | 15 | 2365 | 1 | 814 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Section 3: Applications to the Information Commissioner on Declining to Act on Requests
Description | Number of Requests |
---|---|
Outstanding from previous reporting period | 0 |
Sent during reporting period | 0 |
Total | 0 |
Approved by the Information Commissioner during reporting period | 0 |
Declined by the Information Commissioner during reporting period | 0 |
Withdrawn during reporting period | 0 |
Carried over to next reporting period | 0 |
Section 4: Requests Closed During the Reporting Period
4.1 Disposition and completion time
Disposition of Requests | Completion Time | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 to 15 Days | 16 to 30 Days | 31 to 60 Days | 61 to 120 Days | 121 to 180 Days | 181 to 365 Days | More Than 365 Days |
Total | |
All disclosed | 1 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
Disclosed in part | 3 | 14 | 29 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 56 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No records exist | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Request transferred | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Request abandoned | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Neither confirmed nor denied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Declined to act with the approval of the Information Commissioner |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 8 | 24 | 34 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 79 |
4.2 Exemptions
Section | Number of Requests |
---|---|
13(1)(a) | 10 |
13(1)(b) | 0 |
13(1)(c) | 0 |
13(1)(d) | 0 |
13(1)(e) | 0 |
14 | 0 |
14(a) | 0 |
14(b) | 0 |
15(1) | 0 |
15(1) - I.A.Footnote 1 | 16 |
15(1) - Def.Footnote 2 | 0 |
15(1) - S.A.Footnote 3 | 0 |
16(1)(a)(i) | 0 |
16(1)(a)(ii) | 0 |
16(1)(a)(iii) | 0 |
16(1)(b) | 2 |
16(1)(c) | 3 |
16(1)(d) | 0 |
16(2) | 1 |
16(2)(a) | 0 |
16(2)(b) | - |
16(2)(c) | 1 |
16(3) | 0 |
16.1(1)(a) | 0 |
16.1(1)(b) | 0 |
16.1(1)(c) | 0 |
16.1(1)(d) | 0 |
16.2(1) | 0 |
16.3 | 0 |
16.4(1)(a) | 0 |
16.4(1)(b) | 0 |
16.5 | 0 |
16.6 | 0 |
17 | 0 |
18(a) | 0 |
18(b) | 1 |
18(c) | 0 |
18(d) | 0 |
18.1(1)(a) | 0 |
18.1(1)(b) | 0 |
18.1(1)(c) | 0 |
18.1(1)(d) | 0 |
19(1) | 50 |
20(1)(a) | 0 |
20(1)(b) | 11 |
20(1)(b.1) | 0 |
20(1)(c) | 7 |
20(1)(d) | 1 |
20.1 | 0 |
20.2 | 0 |
20.4 | 0 |
21(1)(a) | 7 |
21(1)(b) | 10 |
21(1)(c) | 4 |
21(1)(d) | 0 |
22 | 0 |
22.1(1) | 0 |
23 | 6 |
23.1 | 0 |
24(1) | 0 |
26 | 0 |
4.3 Exclusions
Section | Number of Requests |
---|---|
68(a) | 1 |
68(b) | 0 |
68(c) | 0 |
68.1 | 0 |
68.2(a) | 0 |
68.2(b) | 0 |
69(1) | 0 |
69(1)(a) | 0 |
69(1)(b) | 0 |
69(1)(c) | 0 |
69(1)(d) | 0 |
69(1)(e) | 0 |
69(1)(f) | 0 |
69(1)(g) re (a) | 1 |
69(1)(g) re (b) | 0 |
69(1)(g) re (c) | 1 |
69(1)(g) re (d) | 0 |
69(1)(g) re (e) | 0 |
69(1)(g) re (f) | 0 |
69.1(1) | 0 |
4.4 Format of information released
Paper | Electronic | Other | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E-record | Data set | Video | Audio | ||
0 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4.5 Complexity
4.5.1 Relevant pages processed and disclosed for paper and e-record formats
Number of Pages Processed | Number of Pages Disclosed | Number of Requests |
---|---|---|
4780 | 1970 | 75 |
4.5.2 Relevant pages processed per request disposition for paper and e-record formats by size of requests
Disposition | Less Than 100 Pages Processed |
100-500 Pages Processed |
501-1000 Pages Processed |
1001-5000 Pages Processed |
More Than 5000 Pages Processed |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Requests |
Pages Processed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Processed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Processed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Processed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Processed |
|
All disclosed | 14 | 122 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Disclosed in part | 48 | 479 | 5 | 1356 | 2 | 1225 | 1 | 1253 | 0 | 0 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 1 | 345 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Request abandoned | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Neither confirmed nor denied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Declined to act with the approval of the Information Commissioner |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 66 | 601 | 6 | 1701 | 2 | 1225 | 1 | 1253 | 0 | 0 |
4.5.3 Relevant minutes processed and disclosed for audio formats
Number of Minutes Processed | Number of Minutes Disclosed | Number of Requests |
---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 |
4.5.4 Relevant minutes processed per request disposition for audio formats by size of requests
Disposition | Less Than 60 Minutes Processed | 60 - 120 Minutes Processed | More than 120 Minutes Processed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Requests |
Minutes Processed |
Number of Requests |
Minutes Processed |
Number of Requests |
Minutes Processed |
|
All disclosed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Disclosed in part | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Request abandoned | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Neither confirmed nor denied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Declined to act with the approval of the Information Commissioner |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4.5.5 Relevant minutes processed and disclosed for video formats
Number of Minutes Processed | Number of Minutes Disclosed | Number of Requests |
---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 |
4.5.6 Relevant minutes processed per request disposition for video formats by size of requests
Disposition | Less Than 60 Minutes Processed | 60 - 120 Minutes Processed | More than 120 Minutes Processed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Requests |
Minutes Processed |
Number of Requests |
Minutes Processed |
Number of Requests |
Minutes Processed |
|
All disclosed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Disclosed in part | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Request abandoned | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Neither confirmed nor denied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Declined to act with the approval of the Information Commissioner |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4.5.7 Other complexities
Disposition | Consultation Required | Legal Advice Sought | Other | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
All disclosed | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Disclosed in part | 32 | 8 | 0 | 40 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Request abandoned | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Neither confirmed nor denied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Declined to act with the approval of the Information Commissioner |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 37 | 8 | 0 | 45 |
4.6 Closed requests
4.6.1 Requests closed within legislated timelines
Number of requests closed within legislated timelines | 76 |
---|---|
Percentage of requests closed within legislated timelines (%) | 96.20253165 |
4.7 Deemed refusals
4.7.1 Reasons for not meeting legislated timelines
Number of requests closed past the legislated timelines | Principal Reason | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Interference with operations/ Workload |
External Consultation | Internal Consultation | Other | |
3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
4.7.2 Requests closed beyond legislated timelines (including any extension taken)
Number of days past legislated timelines | Number of requests past legislated timeline where no extension was taken | Number of requests past legislated timeline where an extension was taken | Total |
---|---|---|---|
1 to 15 days | 0 | 0 | 0 |
16 to 30 days | 0 | 0 | 0 |
31 to 60 days | 0 | 1 | 1 |
61 to 120 days | 0 | 0 | 0 |
121 to 180 days | 0 | 1 | 1 |
181 to 365 days | 0 | 0 | 0 |
More than 365 days | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Total | 0 | 3 | 3 |
4.8 Requests for translation
Translation Requests | Accepted | Refused | Total |
---|---|---|---|
English to French | 0 | 0 | 0 |
French to English | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Section 5: Extensions
5.1 Reasons for extensions and disposition of requests
Disposition of Requests Where an Extension Was Taken | 9(1)(a) Interference With Operations/ Workload |
9(1)(b) Consultation |
9(1)(c) Third-Party Notice |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Section 69 | Other | |||
All disclosed | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
Disclosed in part | 1 | 2 | 38 | 0 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Request abandoned | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No records exist | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Declined to act with the approval of the Information Commissioner |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 1 | 2 | 43 | 0 |
5.2 Length of extensions
Length of Extensions | 9(1)(a) Interference With Operations/ Workload |
9(1)(b) Consultation |
9(1)(c) Third-Party Notice |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Section 69 | Other | |||
30 days or less | 0 | 1 | 2 | - |
31 to 60 days | 0 | 0 | 34 | - |
61 to 120 days | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
121 to 180 days | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
181 to 365 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
365 days or more | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 1 | 2 | 43 | 0 |
Section 6: Fees
Fee Type | Fee Collected | Fee Waived | Fee Refunded | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Requests |
Amount | Number of Requests |
Amount | Number of Requests |
Amount | |
Application | 18 | $90.00 | 59 | $295.00 | 1 | $5.00 |
Other fees | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
Total | 18 | $90.00 | 59 | $295.00 | 1 | $5.00 |
Section 7: Consultations Received From Other Institutions and Organizations
7.1 Consultations received from other Government of Canada institutions and other organizations
Consultations | Other Government of Canada Institutions | Number of Pages to Review | Other Organizations | Number of Pages to Review |
---|---|---|---|---|
Received during the reporting period | 34 | 1561 | 0 | 0 |
Outstanding from the previous reporting period | 1 | 689 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 35 | 2250 | 0 | 0 |
Closed during the reporting period | 34 | 1561 | 0 | 0 |
Carried over within negotiated timelines | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Carried over beyond negotiated timelines | 1 | 689 | 0 | 0 |
7.2 Recommendations and completion time for consultations received from other Government of Canada institutions
Recommendation | Number of Days Required to Complete Consultation Requests | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 to 15 Days | 16 to 30 Days | 31 to 60 Days | 61 to 120 Days | 121 to 180 Days | 181 to 365 Days | More Than 365 Days |
Total | |
Disclose entirely | 18 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
Disclose in part | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
Exempt entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Exclude entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Consult other institution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 21 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 |
7.3 Recommendations and completion time for consultations received from other organizations outside the Government of Canada
Recommendation | Number of Days Required to Complete Consultation Requests | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 to 15 Days | 16 to 30 Days | 31 to 60 Days | 61 to 120 Days | 121 to 180 Days | 181 to 365 Days | More Than 365 Days |
Total | |
Disclose entirely | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Disclose in part | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Exempt entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Exclude entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Consult other institution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Section 8: Completion Time of Consultations on Cabinet Confidences
8.1 Requests with Legal Services
Number of Days | Fewer Than 100 Pages Processed | 100-500 Pages Processed | 501-1000 Pages Processed |
1001-5000 Pages Processed |
More Than 5000 Pages Processed |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
|
1 to 15 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
16 to 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
31 to 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
61 to 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
121 to 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
181 to 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
More than 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 1 | 3 | 1 | 105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8.2 Requests with Privy Council Office
Number of Days | Fewer Than 100 Pages Processed | 100‒500 Pages Processed | 501-1000 Pages Processed |
1001-5000 Pages Processed |
More Than 5000 Pages Processed |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
|
1 to 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
16 to 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
31 to 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
61 to 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
121 to 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
181 to 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
More than 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Section 9: Investigations and Reports of finding
9.1 Investigations
Section 32 Notice of intention to investigate | Subsection 30(5) Ceased to investigate | Section 35 Formal Representations |
---|---|---|
2 | 1 | 0 |
9.2 Investigations and Reports of finding
Section 37(1) Initial Reports | Section 37(2) Final Reports | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Received | Containing recommendations issued by the Information Commissioner | Containing orders issued by the Information Commissioner | Received | Containing recommendations issued by the Information Commissioner | Containing orders issued by the Information Commissioner |
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Section 10: Court Action
10.1 Court actions on complaints
Complainant (1) | Institution (2) | Third Party (3) | Privacy Commissioner (4) | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
10.2 Court actions on third party notifications under paragraph 28(1)(b)
Section 44 - under paragraph 28(1)(b) |
---|
0 |
Section 11: Resources Related to the Access to Information Act
11.1 Allocated Costs
Expenditures | Amount |
---|---|
Salaries | $204,518 |
Overtime | $0 |
Goods and Services
|
$0 |
Total | $204,518 |
11.2 Human Resources
Resources | Person Years Dedicated to Access to Information Activities |
---|---|
Full-time employees | 2.600 |
Part-time and casual employees | 0.000 |
Regional staff | 0.000 |
Consultants and agency personnel | 0.000 |
Students | 0.250 |
Total | 2.850 |
Note: Enter values to three decimal places.