Evaluation Summary Space Astronomy Missions and Planetary Missions Programs

About the programs

Space Astronomy Missions (SAM) Encompasses the definition, design, technology development, implementation and use of complete Canadian space telescope systems and the provision of Canadian instruments, sensors and subsystems to international space telescope or probe missions. It generates scientific data about the universe through the observation of the solar system and deep space.

Planetary Missions (PM) Encompasses the definition, design, technology development, implementation and use of Canadian exploration signature technologies and scientific instruments made available to international exploration missions. It supports the robotic exploration of remote bodies (planets, asteroids, etc.) to conduct detailed observations and science.

About the evaluation

Evaluation covers the period from April 2011 to March 2016 during which the total disbursements amounted to over $100 M.

Conducted in 2017 in response to the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat's Policy on results (2016).

The evaluation's purpose is to systematically collect and analyze evidence on the relevance, effectiveness and efficiency of these programs, as well as unintended outcomes for the reporting period

It is the first evaluation of the SAM & PM programs.

The evaluation used a mixed-methods approach that combined qualitative and quantitative analyses which included:

• Documentation review
• Key informant interviews (with the CSA, industry, academia and international partners)
• E-surveys
• Two case studies

What we have learned?

• The programs are highly relevant and well aligned with the government's innovation agenda and the CSA's mandate.
• These programs are essential to maintaining a world-class cadre of astronomers and planetary scientists in Canada dedicated to advancing the knowledge of space through scientific discovery.
• The CSA is the only federal organization that provides the scientific community with access to space astronomy opportunities and data.
• Canadian instruments on space astronomy and planetary missions have transmitted a constant stream of observations and images of various types and quality over the years.
• The programs are highly cost-effective which have contributed to Canada's reputation in the international space exploration community.

How can we improve the programs?

• The evaluation found that the engagement of the science teams was delayed due to a lack of grant funding at start-up and fragmented funding for scientific research during and after missions.
• The principle of end-to-end funding for science team participation in space missions is generally accepted as a standard best practice.
• Recommendation: The program should develop clear guidelines that clarify the definition and scope of science support to missions in order to allow for the continuity of science support funding throughout all phases of a mission from pre-definition phase to post-operation activities.