prepared by the
Audit and Evaluation Directorate
December 2011

| Table of Contents |

The audit objective was to determine whether a management framework is in place to enable the organization to carry out effective succession planning.

In our opinion, the organization has an appropriate and wellmonitored management framework in place for succession planning.

As Chief Audit Executive, it is my opinion that the audit procedures applied and the evidence gathered are sufficient and appropriate to support the opinion formulated in this report. This opinion is based on a comparison of existing conditions and audit criteria established before the audit and accepted by management. The opinion applies only to the entity examined.

The audit showed that the CSA identifies and assesses succession planning risks at regular intervals. The planning is done in a progressive, integrated manner, particularly since two new committees were set up (Human Resources / Finance Committee and Integrated Management Coordinating Committee [IMCC]), while the effectiveness of planning and management procedures is assessed in various ways (e.g., Management Accountability Framework [MAF], Staffing Management Accountability Framework [SMAF] and Public Service Employee Surveys [PSES]).
In addition, recruiting, training, learning, professional development and corporate knowledge transfer strategies have been developed and implemented. Performance appraisals are designed to be constructive and remedial and include commitments for the next year, individual learning plans and professional development plans. The CSA also verifies staff turnover at regular intervals and in order to promote employee retention, studies the reasons why employees leave.
Before this audit was carried out, management had already identified a weakness in the identification of key positions within the organization and had already made plans to identify these positions during the 20122013 fiscal year in accordance with the specific schedule on page 8 of this report. Consequently, although we know that this essential identification exercise has not yet been carried out, we did not include any recommendation in that regard in this report. Based on the information gathered during the audit, we are confident that management will identify these positions as provided for in the established schedule.
_________________________________________________________________
Signature of the Chief Audit Executive
Member of the audit team
The organization is active in a specialized field where there are relatively few people with required expertise. In addition to having to recruit and retain employees who are competent in their specific fields, the organization must be able to train employees who are interested in key management positions so that it can develop in both a scientific and technical context and a federal government context.

Objective:
The audit objective was to determine whether a management framework is in place to enable the organization to carry out effective succession planning.
Scope:
The audit was conducted from July to December 2011. We used the audit evidence available during this period to formulate our opinion.
Approach:
The audit included various audit procedures, including interviews, a review of documents and observations. The audit criteria were based on various Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) succession planning management guides and on best succession planning practices.
To ensure that the organization has implemented appropriate and effective succession planning measures, we expected to find the following:
1. Risks identified and assessed by management;
2. Planning procedures;
3. Recruiting, learning, training and professional development procedures; and
4. Management procedures (performance appraisals, employee retention, staff turnover, effectiveness of the succession planning process).
Audit objective: Determine whether a management framework is in place to enable the organization to carry out effective succession planning. |
||
|---|---|---|
Findings |
Criterion 1 |
Management identifies and assesses risks. |
Conditions |
We found that succession planning risks were identified and assessed at regular intervals and as part of two different activities:
For the purposes of identifying and assessing the CSA's risks, the following documents are consulted:
We also found that key positions had not yet been identified. We believe it is essential to identify them in order to be able to assess risks appropriately and carry out and manage succession planning effectively. The Human Resources Directorate had planned to identify key positions during the 20122013 fiscal year according to the following steps:
For the time being, the positions that have a critical influence on the operational activities or the strategic objectives of the organization are identified in the staffing activities prioritization exercise. This exercise allows the Executive Committee to decide on the prioritization of staffing activities, taking into account available financial resources and the organization’s ability to meet all of the demand. Given that even before this audit was conducted, management had already planned to identify key positions, we did not include a recommendation in that regard in this report. Based on the gathered information, we are confident that management will identify these positions as planned in the above‐mentioned |
|
Causes |
N/A |
|
Effects |
N/A |
|
Recommendations |
N/A |
|
Responsibility Identified |
Organization |
N/A |
Function |
N/A |
|
Management |
N/A |
|
Management Action Plan |
Action plan details |
Timetable |
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
Audit objective: Determine whether a management framework is in place to enable the organization to carry out effective succession planning. |
||
|---|---|---|
Findings |
Criterion 2 |
Planning procedures are in place. |
Conditions |
We found that the CSA develops and implements various plans and strategies for succession planning, learning, training, professional development and knowledge transfers. These plans and strategies have been developed for senior management (EX), scientific (ENG, RES), technical (EG, EL) and corporate (PE, CS) positions. The plans cover all CSA reporting levels (senior management, managers, supervisors and employees). In addition, a strategy for using student programs has been developed. ToolsThe human resource planning tools used by the CSA take succession planning risks into account. These tools are used to determine the CSA’s current and future requirements, identify existing employees, compare them with the CSA’s current and future requirements and thus identify positions that must be Subsequently, the manager responsible for the staffing process uses updated SMCs and work descriptions to determine the essential qualifications for the positions to be staffed. There are also generic SMCs for some job groups, which help to speed up the staffing of positions belonging to those groups. The CSA also uses a self‐assessment tool developed jointly by various departments that CSA staff (supervisors, managers, senior managers and employees) can use to define key skills for the purposes of discussions about performance, learning needs and career planning. The CSA also had plans to gradually implement competency‐based management (CBM) for learning, performance appraisal and human resource planning and staffing activities. CBM can be used to identify, define, measure, develop and Integration of planningSome weaknesses in the integration of human resource planning with the CSA’s planning of operations had been reported in recent years. In that regard, the 2011–2012 HR Priorities document prepared by Human Resources mentions the need of improvement in this area. In addition, the CSA Corporate Risk Profile mentions the need to incorporate human resource planning into the CSA’s strategic planning and financial cycle. We found that several improvements had been implemented to facilitate this integration, including the setting up of two committees, ie, the Human Resources / Finance Committee and the IMCC. The Year One Report of the 2010–2013 IHRP exercise recommends that these two committees continue their efforts to integrate management planning procedures, that the participation of managers and their administrative staff be simplified, that relevant information be provided for departmental decision making and that the Agency be provided with assistance in order to meet the expectations of the central agencies. In addition, the IHRP exercise now makes reference to the Program Activity Architecture (PAA) and clearly establishes a relationship between the human resource strategies and the organization’s operational objectives. A list of staffing activities based on the Annual Reference Level Update (ARLU) and the |
|
Causes |
N/A |
|
Effects |
N/A |
|
Recommendations |
N/A |
|
Responsibility Identified |
Organization |
N/A |
Function |
N/A |
|
Management |
N/A |
|
Management Action Plan |
Action plan details |
Timetable |
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
Audit objective: Determine whether a management framework is in place to enable the organization to carry out effective succession planning. |
||
|---|---|---|
Findings |
Criterion 3 |
The CSA has recruiting, learning, training and professional development procedures in place. |
Conditions |
In order to recruit and provide training and professional development for the next generation of employees, the CSA refers to policies, guidelines and guides developed in house and externally (by the Treasury Board [TB], the TBS and the Public Service Commission [PSC]). These documents provide a framework for the strategies developed and implemented by the CSA. The CSA uses a variety of recruiting strategies, such as recruitment programs for the scientific and technical sectors, group staffing processes for the purposes of creating pools of qualified candidates, generic staffing processes, internal promotions, the Finance Officer Recruitment and Development / Internal Auditor Recruitment and Development (FORD/IARD) program and the student program. These strategies give the CSA timely access to various sources of potential applicants. The CSA has developed and implemented learning, training and professional development strategies, such as required learning, a continuous learning program (CLP), Professional Development And Apprenticeship Program (PDAP), departmental learning priorities, annual individual learning plans, career management services, coaching services, mentoring programs, a management succession planning initiative and professional development programs for employees at EX, ENG, EG, EL, PE and CS levels. These strategies help employees acquire the skills they need to develop their potential and advance in the organization. |
|
Causes |
N/A |
|
Effects |
N/A |
|
Recommendations |
N/A |
|
Responsibility Identified |
Organization |
N/A |
Function |
N/A |
|
Management |
N/A |
|
Management Action Plan |
Action plan details |
Timetable |
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
Audit objective: Determine whether a management framework is in place to enable the organization to carry out effective succession planning. |
||
|---|---|---|
Findings |
Criterion 4 |
Management procedures are in place. |
Conditions |
In terms of management procedures, the CSA uses various policies, guidelines and guides as references, including the following:
Performance managementThe CSA has posted on its intranet site a toolkit consisting of a set of documents and references to help managers effectively manage the employee performance management process. The narrative portion of performance appraisals is designed in a constructive, remedial way and indicates to employees current behaviour to be improved upon and desired changes in behaviour. The appraisals also contain commitments for the coming year, an individual learning plan and a professional development plan. Employee retentionTo retain employees, the CSA uses methods such as in‐house assignments, the Interchange Canada Program and secondments to help develop employee loyalty and help employees further their professional development. Various incentives exist, such as an employee assistance program, bonuses paid to engineers and continuous learning programs. Furthermore, the CSA invests in an organizational development function which issues regular information capsules on subjects such as the well being at work, and organizes workshops and workplace wellness forums. The CSA also has an employee recognition program that includes the presentation of excellence and long service awards. Surveys and analysis of organizational dataThe PSES is the main tool used by the Agency to ascertain the satisfaction of its employees. The responses to the survey are analysed and used to develop an action plan to implement identified opportunities for improvement. Staff turnover is analysed every year mainly from information taken from the Demographic Profile and Organizational Review prepared by the CSA. The CSA has also set up a program to collect feedback from departing employees. The three main objectives of this program are the following:
Effectiveness of succession planning managementTo assess the effectiveness of succession planning and of succession planning management, the CSA uses the following tools that we considered appropriate:
We also found that an exercise to determine succession planning effectiveness is conducted regularly. During this exercise, the average length of time (in calendar days) that certain positions remain vacant is determined. This exercise is carried out solely for EX positions because key positions other than EX positions have not yet been identified. Furthermore, several documents that we examined revealed that the CSA has made it clear to employees that succession planning and succession planning management are organizational priorities. |
|
Causes |
N/A |
|
Effects |
N/A |
|
Recommendations |
N/A |
|
Responsibility Identified |
Organization |
N/A |
Function |
N/A |
|
Management |
N/A |
|
Management Action Plan |
Action plan details |
Timetable |
|
N/A |
N/A |
|